Assessing Productivity and Economic Potential of Pond-Based Culture of Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) and Babylon Snail (Babylonia areolata) in Monoculture and Four Different Coculture Arrangements

单作 生产力 蜗牛 生物 生产成本 渔业 农业科学 生态学 工程类 经济 机械工程 宏观经济学
作者
Gregory T. Dobson,William L. Johnston,Nguyen Dinh Quang Duy,Paul C. Southgate
出处
期刊:Journal of Shellfish Research [BioOne (National Shellfisheries Association)]
卷期号:41 (3) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.2983/035.041.0307
摘要

The aim of this study was to create an economic decision-making tool to allow farmers and stakeholders to make informed decisions around costs, benefits, and risks involved in production of sandfish, Holothuria scabra, and Babylon snail, Babylonia areolata, in different coculture arrangements based on a sound economic framework. A small-scale (0.16 ha) farm operation in Vietnam was modelled using production data obtained in previous studies to represent the costs and returns of rearing sandfish in tank-based nursery systems and in pond-based coculture grow-out systems. Sandfish and Babylonia monoculture was compared with three coculture models where the two species were separated, and the amount of pond area allocated to each ranged from 25% to 75%. A fourth coculture model (Co-4; “comingled”) was assessed where the two species were not separated and shared 100% of the substrate. The sandfish monoculture system produced 487 kg of sandfish at an annual cost of USD 5,616, providing an annual return of USD –3,521. The largest annual cost associated with sandfish monoculture was labor (USD 8.04 per kg). Pond monoculture of Babylon snail returned USD 1,876 annually, with an annual production cost of USD 19,858. Feeding represented the largest production cost associated with Babylonia monoculture of USD 14,340 per annum, or USD 5.11 per kg. Sandfish monoculture and Babylonia monoculture returned benefit–cost ratios of 0.37 and 1.09, respectively. The coculture model with pond area divided 50:50 between sandfish and Babylonia during grow-out, produced 258 kg of sandfish and 2,584 kg of Babylonia over a 359-day production cycle. This equates to USD 1,108 and USD 20,001 annual production of sandfish and Babylonia, respectively. After production costs, this model provided a return of USD 2,309 annually at a benefit–cost ratio of 1.12. The comingled culture model, Co-4, provided the greatest annual return of USD 6,019 and a benefit–cost ratio of 1.24. Results of this study build on previous research into practical aspects of sandfish/Babylonia coculture and provide a more complete picture of the potential application of this research to improve livelihoods and income of small-scale farmers in Vietnam.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
XIEQ发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Miao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ei发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
lili完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
三木发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zzc发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
英姑应助宁过儿采纳,获得10
5秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
无极微光应助喜悦采枫采纳,获得20
5秒前
pe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ei完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研小白发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
犟牛儿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Yu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
充电宝应助Lialilico采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
zhangchunjie发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
生腌生腌发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
shapolang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
充电宝应助Miao采纳,获得30
10秒前
慕青应助lili采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
无花果应助kk采纳,获得10
11秒前
哦呵呵哈哈啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
正午的火车站完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
开朗大雁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
shapolang发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
幻光完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
之道驳回了SciGPT应助
16秒前
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助cj采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
Standard: In-Space Storable Fluid Transfer for Prepared Spacecraft (AIAA S-157-2024) 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5949030
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7120212
关于积分的说明 15914589
捐赠科研通 5082170
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2732391
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1692845
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1615544