Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Programmed Death-Ligand 1–High Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

医学 彭布罗利珠单抗 打开标签 肿瘤科 内科学 随机对照试验 免疫疗法 癌症
作者
Byoung Chul Cho,Jong Seok Lee,Yi−Long Wu,İrfan Çiçin,Manuel Cobo,Myung‐Ju Ahn,Kristof Cuppens,R. Veillon,Ernest Nadal,Josiane Mourão Dias,Claudio Martín,Martin Reck,Edward B. Garon,Enriqueta Felip,Luis Paz‐Ares,F. Mornex,Everett E. Vokes,Alex A. Adjei,Clifford G. Robinson,Masashi Sato
出处
期刊:Journal of Thoracic Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:18 (12): 1731-1742 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018
摘要

Abstract

Introduction

Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC.

Methods

This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival.

Results

Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1–16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1–15.9 mo) for pembrolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent review committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo–not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo–NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885–1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo–NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo–NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796–1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point.

Conclusions

First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1–high, advanced NSCLC.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
王佳慧完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
龙06完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
北栀发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
饱满的百招完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Grace完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
稀罕你完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
小汤完成签到 ,获得积分20
2秒前
Shayulajiao发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
shenme完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
打工仔完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
mmmst发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
简单山蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Blessing完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
吴科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
溆玉碎兰笑完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI5应助不能随便采纳,获得10
5秒前
单身的钧完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
在水一方应助Shayulajiao采纳,获得10
7秒前
xueshu小裁缝完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
fffan完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Evy完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
xiao完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
青青完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
曲聋五完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
请各位大佬帮帮小白完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
鱼鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
豆豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
JJiebond完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
子里完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
ailuming完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
谢思妍完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
谦让霸完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Power完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
玥越完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The Insulin Resistance Epidemic: Uncovering the Root Cause of Chronic Disease  500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3662278
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3223084
关于积分的说明 9750065
捐赠科研通 2932888
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605851
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 758174
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734727