亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Gravidity modifies the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability: a large cohort study from China

生育率 人口学 医学 不育 妇科 怀孕 队列 人口 队列研究 产科 生物 内科学 社会学 遗传学
作者
Yue Zhang,Honggang Zhang,Jun Zhao,Xiaochen Zhang,Junhui Zhang,Lifang Jiang,Yuan Yuan Wang,Zuoqi Peng,Zhang Ya,Kai Jiao,Tianyu He,Qiaomei Wang,Haiping Shen,Yiping Zhang,Donghai Yan,Xu Ma
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:39 (1): 201-208
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dead209
摘要

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do couple’s age ranges for optimal fecundability, and the associations with fecundability of couple’s age combinations and age differences differ with gravidity? SUMMARY ANSWER The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability and age combinations differed with gravidity, and gravidity might modify the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Age is one of the strongest determinants of fecundability, but the existing studies have certain limitations in study population, couple’s extreme age combinations and age differences, and have not explored whether the association between age and fecundability differs with gravidity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study. 5 407 499 general reproductive-aged couples (not diagnosed with infertility) participated in the National Free Pre-conception Check-up Projects during 2015–2017. They were followed up for pregnancy outcomes through telephone interviews every 3 months until they became pregnant or were followed up for 1 year. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The main outcome was time to pregnancy, and the fecundability odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox models for discrete survival time. The associations of age and spousal age difference with fecundability were evaluated by restricted cubic splines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In this large cohort of general reproductive-aged population, the age of optimal fecundability of multigravida couples was older than that of nulligravida couples, but their subsequent fecundability declined more sharply with age. The decline in female fecundability was more pronounced with age, with fecundability dropping by ∼30% in both nulligravida and multigravida couples whose female partners aged ≥35 years. In the nulligravida group, the fecundability of couples who were both ≤24 years with the same age was the highest, which decreased steadily with the increase of spousal age difference, and younger male partners did not seem to contribute to improving couple’s fecundability. In the multigravida group, couples with female partners aged 25–34 years and a spousal age difference of −5 to 5 years showed higher fecundability, and the effect of spousal age difference on couple’s fecundability became suddenly apparent when female partners aged around 40 years. Young male partners were unable to change the decisive effect of female partner’s age over 40 years on couple’s reduced fecundability, regardless of gravidity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Lacking the time for couples to attempt pregnancy before enrollment, and some couples might suspend pregnancy plans during follow-up because of certain emergencies, which would misestimate the fecundability. Due to the lack of information on sperm quality and sexual frequency of couples, we could not adjust for these factors. Moreover, due to population characteristics, the extrapolation of our results required caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability, age combinations, and spousal age difference on fecundability varied with gravidity. Female age-related decline in fecundability was more dominant in couple’s fecundability. Targeted fertility guidance should be provided to couples with different age combinations and gravidities. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research received funding from the Project of National Research Institute for Family Planning (Grant No. 2018NRIFPJ03), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1000307), and the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (Grant No. 2005DKA21300), People’s Republic of China. The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
金钰贝儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
hty完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
喜悦的飞飞完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
NexusExplorer应助季1采纳,获得10
19秒前
46秒前
49秒前
季1发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
yangzai完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
1分钟前
breeze完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
哭泣的丝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
jfuU发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
任性机器猫完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
爱静静应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
zhl完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
JamesPei应助涂楚捷采纳,获得10
2分钟前
梨凉完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
汉堡包应助梨凉采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
脑洞疼应助逗逗采纳,获得10
3分钟前
天降发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
逗逗发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Beyond095完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
小艾艾麦仑完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
充电宝应助小艾艾麦仑采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
LULU发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
冰冰完成签到,获得积分20
4分钟前
文欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3126059
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2776271
关于积分的说明 7729679
捐赠科研通 2431643
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1292218
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622582
版权声明 600392