Gravidity modifies the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability: a large cohort study from China

生育率 人口学 医学 不育 妇科 怀孕 队列 人口 队列研究 产科 生物 内科学 社会学 遗传学
作者
Yue Zhang,Honggang Zhang,Jun Zhao,Xiaochen Zhang,Junhui Zhang,Lifang Jiang,Yuan Yuan Wang,Zuoqi Peng,Zhang Ya,Kai Jiao,Tianyu He,Qiaomei Wang,Haiping Shen,Yiping Zhang,Donghai Yan,Xu Ma
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:39 (1): 201-208
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dead209
摘要

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do couple’s age ranges for optimal fecundability, and the associations with fecundability of couple’s age combinations and age differences differ with gravidity? SUMMARY ANSWER The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability and age combinations differed with gravidity, and gravidity might modify the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Age is one of the strongest determinants of fecundability, but the existing studies have certain limitations in study population, couple’s extreme age combinations and age differences, and have not explored whether the association between age and fecundability differs with gravidity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study. 5 407 499 general reproductive-aged couples (not diagnosed with infertility) participated in the National Free Pre-conception Check-up Projects during 2015–2017. They were followed up for pregnancy outcomes through telephone interviews every 3 months until they became pregnant or were followed up for 1 year. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The main outcome was time to pregnancy, and the fecundability odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox models for discrete survival time. The associations of age and spousal age difference with fecundability were evaluated by restricted cubic splines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In this large cohort of general reproductive-aged population, the age of optimal fecundability of multigravida couples was older than that of nulligravida couples, but their subsequent fecundability declined more sharply with age. The decline in female fecundability was more pronounced with age, with fecundability dropping by ∼30% in both nulligravida and multigravida couples whose female partners aged ≥35 years. In the nulligravida group, the fecundability of couples who were both ≤24 years with the same age was the highest, which decreased steadily with the increase of spousal age difference, and younger male partners did not seem to contribute to improving couple’s fecundability. In the multigravida group, couples with female partners aged 25–34 years and a spousal age difference of −5 to 5 years showed higher fecundability, and the effect of spousal age difference on couple’s fecundability became suddenly apparent when female partners aged around 40 years. Young male partners were unable to change the decisive effect of female partner’s age over 40 years on couple’s reduced fecundability, regardless of gravidity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Lacking the time for couples to attempt pregnancy before enrollment, and some couples might suspend pregnancy plans during follow-up because of certain emergencies, which would misestimate the fecundability. Due to the lack of information on sperm quality and sexual frequency of couples, we could not adjust for these factors. Moreover, due to population characteristics, the extrapolation of our results required caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability, age combinations, and spousal age difference on fecundability varied with gravidity. Female age-related decline in fecundability was more dominant in couple’s fecundability. Targeted fertility guidance should be provided to couples with different age combinations and gravidities. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research received funding from the Project of National Research Institute for Family Planning (Grant No. 2018NRIFPJ03), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1000307), and the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (Grant No. 2005DKA21300), People’s Republic of China. The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
苗条的小蜜蜂完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
高野发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Yang22完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
天真千易发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6028463
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7690915
关于积分的说明 16186572
捐赠科研通 5175617
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2769611
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753067
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638833