清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Gravidity modifies the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability: a large cohort study from China

生育率 人口学 医学 不育 妇科 怀孕 队列 人口 队列研究 产科 生物 内科学 社会学 遗传学
作者
Yue Zhang,Honggang Zhang,Jun Zhao,Xiaochen Zhang,Junhui Zhang,Lifang Jiang,Yuan Yuan Wang,Zuoqi Peng,Zhang Ya,Kai Jiao,Tianyu He,Qiaomei Wang,Haiping Shen,Yiping Zhang,Donghai Yan,Xu Ma
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:39 (1): 201-208
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dead209
摘要

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do couple’s age ranges for optimal fecundability, and the associations with fecundability of couple’s age combinations and age differences differ with gravidity? SUMMARY ANSWER The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability and age combinations differed with gravidity, and gravidity might modify the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple’s fecundability. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Age is one of the strongest determinants of fecundability, but the existing studies have certain limitations in study population, couple’s extreme age combinations and age differences, and have not explored whether the association between age and fecundability differs with gravidity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study. 5 407 499 general reproductive-aged couples (not diagnosed with infertility) participated in the National Free Pre-conception Check-up Projects during 2015–2017. They were followed up for pregnancy outcomes through telephone interviews every 3 months until they became pregnant or were followed up for 1 year. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The main outcome was time to pregnancy, and the fecundability odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox models for discrete survival time. The associations of age and spousal age difference with fecundability were evaluated by restricted cubic splines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In this large cohort of general reproductive-aged population, the age of optimal fecundability of multigravida couples was older than that of nulligravida couples, but their subsequent fecundability declined more sharply with age. The decline in female fecundability was more pronounced with age, with fecundability dropping by ∼30% in both nulligravida and multigravida couples whose female partners aged ≥35 years. In the nulligravida group, the fecundability of couples who were both ≤24 years with the same age was the highest, which decreased steadily with the increase of spousal age difference, and younger male partners did not seem to contribute to improving couple’s fecundability. In the multigravida group, couples with female partners aged 25–34 years and a spousal age difference of −5 to 5 years showed higher fecundability, and the effect of spousal age difference on couple’s fecundability became suddenly apparent when female partners aged around 40 years. Young male partners were unable to change the decisive effect of female partner’s age over 40 years on couple’s reduced fecundability, regardless of gravidity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Lacking the time for couples to attempt pregnancy before enrollment, and some couples might suspend pregnancy plans during follow-up because of certain emergencies, which would misestimate the fecundability. Due to the lack of information on sperm quality and sexual frequency of couples, we could not adjust for these factors. Moreover, due to population characteristics, the extrapolation of our results required caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The couple’s age range of optimal fecundability, age combinations, and spousal age difference on fecundability varied with gravidity. Female age-related decline in fecundability was more dominant in couple’s fecundability. Targeted fertility guidance should be provided to couples with different age combinations and gravidities. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research received funding from the Project of National Research Institute for Family Planning (Grant No. 2018NRIFPJ03), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1000307), and the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (Grant No. 2005DKA21300), People’s Republic of China. The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
雨城完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
简奥斯汀完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
34秒前
mawen完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
忧虑的静柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
1分钟前
源孤律醒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科科通通完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
汉堡包应助明天会更美好采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
wanci应助曾经寄文采纳,获得30
1分钟前
求是鹰完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
海晏完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助追光采纳,获得10
1分钟前
奋斗的小研完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
289600完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
kouxinyao完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
赘婿应助追光采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
曾经寄文发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
三三完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
sxjkzzy完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
一一完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Jasperlee完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
vbnn完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
淡然的芷荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
兜兜完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助曾经寄文采纳,获得100
2分钟前
雨后完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
厚德载物完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
江三村完成签到 ,获得积分0
3分钟前
闻巷雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
王志新完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Akim应助天真千易采纳,获得10
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6028312
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7688385
关于积分的说明 16186349
捐赠科研通 5175519
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2769531
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1752974
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638773