Quality evaluation of French guidelines in primary care infectious disease: An AGREE II assessment

Abstract Rationale Antibiotic prescription, its nature and its duration are a very common decision‐making situation in primary care practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are regularly emitted by various organisations on this topic. Aims and objectives Our goal is to run a quality appraisal of the current French guidelines, for the most common primary care infectious pathologies. Method We collected all primary care CPGs that are currently prevailing in France through a systematic review of the french website Antibioclic ® . For each of these guidelines, a quality assessment was run by 3 independent reviewers, by means of the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II instrument. The main outcome was a ‘reliability score’, defined as the sum of the scores in domains ‘rigour of development’ and ‘editorial independence’. To be considered ‘reliable’, the CPG had to reach a 60% threshold in these two domains. Secondary outcomes were as follows: global quality score of CPGs, number and ratio of CPGs for which a systematic review has been conducted during its conception. Results Over the 43 CPGs that have been assessed, none reached the 60%‐threshold as to the reliability score. Only one CPG (2.33%) gets an over‐60% quality assessment in the domain of rigour of development (D3), whereas three CPGs (6.98%) reach this threshold in the domain of editorial independence (D6). One CPG (2.33%) met the quality threshold of 60% as to overall assessment. Rigour of development and editorial independence are the domains that obtained the lowest average score, respectively, 11% and 21%. Overall assessment received an average score of 29%. A systematic review of the literature was mentioned for 10 CPGs (23.26%). Conclusion There is a lack of quality in the development process of the current French guidelines in primary care infectiology. This process should be reconsidered, with higher insistence as to its quality.