Evaluating the Accuracy of ChatGPT in Common Patient Questions Regarding HPV+ Oropharyngeal Carcinoma

人乳头瘤病毒 头颈部癌 医学 头颈部 机构审查委员会 家庭医学 癌症 宫颈癌 普通外科 肿瘤科 内科学 外科
作者
Nikhil Bellamkonda,Janice L. Farlow,Catherine T. Haring,Michael W. Sim,Nolan B. Seim,Richard B. Cannon,Marcus M. Monroe,Amit Agrawal,James W. Rocco,Hilary C. McCrary
出处
期刊:Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology [SAGE]
卷期号:133 (9): 814-819
标识
DOI:10.1177/00034894241259137
摘要

Objectives: Large language model (LLM)-based chatbots such as ChatGPT have been publicly available and increasingly utilized by the general public since late 2022. This study sought to investigate ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Methods: This was a prospective, multi-institutional study, with data collected from high volume institutions that perform >50 transoral robotic surgery cases per year. The 100 most recent discussion threads including the term “HPV” on the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Survivors Network’s Head and Neck Cancer public discussion board were reviewed. The 11 most common questions were serially queried to ChatGPT 3.5; answers were recorded. A survey was distributed to fellowship trained head and neck oncologic surgeons at 3 institutions to evaluate the responses. Results: A total of 8 surgeons participated in the study. For questions regarding HPV contraction and transmission, ChatGPT answers were scored as clinically accurate and aligned with consensus in the head and neck surgical oncology community 84.4% and 90.6% of the time, respectively. For questions involving treatment of HPV+ OPC, ChatGPT was clinically accurate and aligned with consensus 87.5% and 91.7% of the time, respectively. For questions regarding the HPV vaccine, ChatGPT was clinically accurate and aligned with consensus 62.5% and 75% of the time, respectively. When asked about circulating tumor DNA testing, only 12.5% of surgeons thought responses were accurate or consistent with consensus. Conclusion: ChatGPT 3.5 performed poorly with questions involving evolving therapies and diagnostics—thus, caution should be used when using a platform like ChatGPT 3.5 to assess use of advanced technology. Patients should be counseled on the importance of consulting their surgeons to receive accurate and up to date recommendations, and use LLM’s to augment their understanding of these important health-related topics.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Alex发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
白樱恋曲发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
景辣条发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
刻苦芒果完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
pp发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
拓跋半仙完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
羞涩的鬼神完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
孤巷的猫发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
10秒前
10秒前
天天快乐应助龙大采纳,获得10
10秒前
摆烂发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
YXY完成签到 ,获得积分20
12秒前
Komorebi完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
俊逸芸遥完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
lunar给lunar的求助进行了留言
13秒前
俗签发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Ethan发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Alex完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
14秒前
疯狂的咖啡豆完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
我是老大应助南庭采纳,获得10
15秒前
YXY关注了科研通微信公众号
16秒前
16秒前
冷酷愚志发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
今后应助高兴的万宝路采纳,获得10
18秒前
瞿霞完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
pura卷卷发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
飘逸宫苴发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
烟花应助瑶瑶采纳,获得10
20秒前
郑尚珏完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
sunshine完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
万能的土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
英俊的铭应助空溟fever采纳,获得30
21秒前
迟梨发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
pp完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
郑尚珏发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Classics in Total Synthesis IV 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3145883
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2797349
关于积分的说明 7823665
捐赠科研通 2453639
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1305792
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627574
版权声明 601491