Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality

成像体模 医学 核医学 图像质量 图像噪声 断层摄影术 图像分辨率 放射科 光学 物理 计算机科学 图像(数学) 人工智能
作者
Jordan Chamberlin,Carter D. Smith,Dhruw Maisuria,John A. Parrish,Elizabeth van Swol,Eugene Mah,Tilman Emrich,U. Joseph Schoepf,Ákos Varga-Szemes,Jim O’Doherty,Reginald F. Munden,Sameer Tipnis,Dhiraj Baruah,Ismail Kabakus
出处
期刊:Clinical Imaging [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:104: 110008-110008
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110008
摘要

Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes.Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details).Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2).Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
英姑应助zhangyingxuan采纳,获得10
1秒前
zyw发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Jasper应助橙子味汽水采纳,获得10
2秒前
多晶1发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
00发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
cicy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
msl2023完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
飞快的孱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助wqx采纳,获得10
6秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助全球采纳,获得10
6秒前
lmt2025发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
沉默伟宸应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
沉默伟宸应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
pluto应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
沉默伟宸应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
qc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
晋绥日报合订本24册(影印本1986年)【1940年9月–1949年5月】 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6032844
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7723485
关于积分的说明 16201617
捐赠科研通 5179508
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2771865
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1755122
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1640064