Extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI is as effective as gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in HCC

PurposeTo compare the performances of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI (ECA-MRI) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in HCC.Materials and MethodsFrom November 2009 to December 2021, consecutive HCC patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled into either an ECA-MRI or EOB-MRI cohort. In the ECA-MRI cohort, a preoperative MVI score was constructed in the training dataset using a logistic regression model that evaluated pathological type. In a propensity score-matched testing dataset of the ECA-MRI cohort, the MVI score was validated and compared with a previously proposed EOB-MRI-based MVI score calculated in the EOB-MRI cohort. Time-to-early recurrence survival was evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test.ResultsA total of 536 patients were included (478 men; 53 years, interquartile range, 46–62 years), 322 (60.1 %) with pathologically confirmed MVI. Based on the training dataset, independent variables associated with MVI included serum alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3), infiltrative appearance (OR = 4.9), internal artery (OR = 2.5) and nodule-in-nodule architecture (OR = 2.4), which were incorporated into the ECA-MRI-based MVI score. The testing dataset AUC of the ECA-MRI score was 0.720, which was comparable to that of the EOB-MRI-based MVI score (AUC = 0.721; P =.99). Patients from either the ECA-MRI or the EOB-MRI cohort with model-predicted MVI had significantly shorter time-to-early recurrence than those without MVI (P <.001).ConclusionBased on the preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein and three MRI features, ECA-MRI demonstrated comparable performance to EOB-MRI for predicting MVI in HCC.