预热
医学
观察研究
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
优势比
随机对照试验
腹部外科
梅德林
四分位间距
物理疗法
内科学
外科
政治学
法学
作者
Pavel Skořepa,Katherine L. Ford,Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Dominic O’Connor,Carla M. Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N. Lobo
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.020
摘要
Background & aims: Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes.The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.Methods: Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes.Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification !Grade 3) and the 6minute walk test (6MWT).The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software.Results: Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included.The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0 e78.4) years.Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one.Metaanalysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference À1.07 days, 95 % CI À1.60 to À0.53 days, P < 0.0001, I 2 ¼ 19 %).Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44 % (odds ratio 0.56, 95 % CI 0.37 to 0.82, P < 0.004, I 2 ¼ 51 %).Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT.The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95 % CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P < 0.00001, I 2 ¼ 24 %), favouring prehabilitation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI