医学
芬太尼
咪唑安定
不利影响
麻醉
急诊科
急诊医学
前瞻性队列研究
剂量
回顾性队列研究
外科
镇静
内科学
精神科
作者
Sriya Jampana,Laura Harrison,Jessica McCall,Rebecca R. Ferrante,Jeffery C. Winer,R Kink,Nathaniel G. Rogers
出处
期刊:Hospital pediatrics
[American Academy of Pediatrics]
日期:2024-09-20
标识
DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-007819
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The use of intranasal (IN) analgesics and sedatives has been studied among pediatrics patients in the emergency department and outpatient settings. However, less is known about their usage in inpatient settings. This study aims to evaluate the indications and safety profile for IN fentanyl and midazolam usage in pediatric patients admitted to a large tertiary care children’s hospital. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of admitted patients receiving IN fentanyl and/or midazolam over a 6-year period. Indications for medication use, medication dosages, patient characteristics, and any serious adverse drug reactions were recorded. Reported serious adverse outcomes include use of reversal agents as well as any documented respiratory depression, hypotension, or need for escalation of care. RESULTS: Of 156 patients included, 119 (76%) received IN midazolam alone, 20 (13%) patients received IN fentanyl alone, and 17 (11%) patients received both medications. The most common applications for IN medication administration were nasogastric tube placements (n = 62), peripheral intravenous line insertions (n = 30), peripherally-inserted central catheter placements (n = 23), and lumbar punctures (n = 16). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IN fentanyl and midazolam were administered to pediatric inpatients undergoing routine procedures without serious adverse drug reactions being reported. Although these findings are encouraging, more prospective studies are needed before wider implementation of IN fentanyl and midazolam administration in pediatric inpatients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI