确定性
纠正性反馈
考试(生物学)
构造(python库)
心理学
介绍(产科)
认知心理学
计算机科学
反馈调节
控制(管理)
数学教育
人工智能
古生物学
程序设计语言
哲学
放射科
认识论
生物
医学
作者
Robert L. Bangert‐Drowns,Chen‐Lin C. Kulik,James A. Kulik,MaryTeresa Morgan
标识
DOI:10.3102/00346543061002213
摘要
Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI