自行车
降级(电信)
锂(药物)
泄流深度
离子
电池(电)
储能
电网储能
航程(航空)
化学工程
材料科学
计算机科学
可再生能源
化学
工艺工程
电气工程
工程类
分布式发电
电信
物理
热力学
复合材料
功率(物理)
考古
有机化学
历史
内分泌学
医学
作者
Yuliya Preger,Heather M. Barkholtz,Armando Fresquez,David V. Campbell,Benjamin W. Juba,Jessica K. Román‐Kustas,Summer Rhodes Ferreira,Babu Chalamala
出处
期刊:Journal of The Electrochemical Society
[The Electrochemical Society]
日期:2020-01-09
卷期号:167 (12): 120532-120532
被引量:290
标识
DOI:10.1149/1945-7111/abae37
摘要
Energy storage systems with Li-ion batteries are increasingly deployed to maintain a robust and resilient grid and facilitate the integration of renewable energy resources. However, appropriate selection of cells for different applications is difficult due to limited public data comparing the most commonly used off-the-shelf Li-ion chemistries under the same operating conditions. This article details a multi-year cycling study of commercial LiFePO 4 (LFP), LiNi x Co y Al 1−x−y O 2 (NCA), and LiNi x Mn y Co 1−x−y O 2 (NMC) cells, varying the discharge rate, depth of discharge (DOD), and environment temperature. The capacity and discharge energy retention, as well as the round-trip efficiency, were compared. Even when operated within manufacturer specifications, the range of cycling conditions had a profound effect on cell degradation, with time to reach 80% capacity varying by thousands of hours and cycle counts among cells of each chemistry. The degradation of cells in this study was compared to that of similar cells in previous studies to identify universal trends and to provide a standard deviation for performance. All cycling files have been made publicly available at batteryarchive.org, a recently developed repository for visualization and comparison of battery data, to facilitate future experimental and modeling efforts.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI