Environmental and individual exposure and the risk of congenital anomalies: a review of recent epidemiological evidence.

流行病学 环境流行病学 环境卫生 医学 病理
作者
Silvia Baldacci,Francesca Gorini,Michele Santoro,Anna Pierini,Fabrizio Minichilli,Fabrizio Bianchi
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:42 (3-4 Suppl 1): 1-34 被引量:128
标识
DOI:10.19191/ep18.3-4.s1.p001.057
摘要

Congenital anomalies (CAs) represent one of the main cause of foetal death, infant mortality and morbidity, and long-term disability. CAs have been object of systematic registration activity for a long-time in many geographical areas in Europe and worldwide. CAs are often associated with disabilities of different types and severity, including the developed Countries worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), each year approximately 3,2 million of children worldwide are born with a CA and approximately 300,000 newborns with a diagnosis of birth defect die within the first 28 days of life. In Europe, CAs are the leading cause of perinatal mortality: the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROC AT) network estimated a perinatal mortality associated with CAs of 9.2 per 10,000 births in 2008-2012. In Italy, the Ministry of Health estimates that, on the average of 500,000 births each year, about 25,000 present at least one CA. Moreover, approximately 25% of infant mortality is due to CAs and about 50% of infant mortality is attributable to perinatal morbidity, almost always of prenatal origin. Regarding long-term survival, a recent population study conducted between 1985 and 2003 in the UK estimated a 20.5-year survival of 85.5% of children born with at least one CA. According to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 3.3% of live births in the United States have a severe birth defect. Since CAs represent a significant public health issue, an effective primary prevention strategy should be a priority for public policies and healthcare system. Regarding aetiology, although in many cases the cause is still unknown, it has been hypothesized that CAs may be developed during the first trimester of pregnancy as a result of hereditary polygenic defects or of a gene-environment interaction. The aetiology is predominantly multifactorial, caused by complex interactions between genes and environment, which modify the normal embryo-foetal development, especially during the organogenesis phase. In particular, environmental factors (e.g., chemical toxicants, infection agents, maternal disease, and exogenous factors) can have preconceptional mutagenic action, postconceptional teratogenic effects, periconceptional endocrine disruption or epigenetic action. Regarding genetic causes, there are genetic chromosomal aberrations or dysgeneses. Furthermore, socioeconomic factors affect reproductive health by differentiating the exposure to the other risk factors as well as the access to prevention measures. In recent years, the importance of the environment as a major factor of reproductive risk has been highlighted. An individual may be exposed to pollutants present in the workplace and the population may be exposed to multiple sources of environmental contamination of water, soil, and air matrices. Pregnant women and the developing foetus are particularly sensitive to the effects of environmental exposure.The aim of the present working paper is to produce an updated review of the epidemiological evidence on the risk of CAs associated with environmental exposures, socioeconomic, and main individual risk factors, such as cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, according to the approach proposed by Pirastu et al. 2010 in the framework of the SENTIERI Project (the Italian Epidemiological Study of Residents in National Priority Contaminated Sites).Literature search was carried out in PubMed, following the SENTIERI project criteria to evaluate evidence, by selecting articles in English or Italian language published from 2011 to 2016 regarding human studies. For this review, descriptive and analytical epidemiological studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and ecological), systematic reviews, and metanalyses reporting association estimates between the outcome and at least one of the risk factors were selected. As in Pirastu et al., the sources of environmental exposure have been classified into four macrocategories: industries, mines, landfills, and incinerators. The sources of individual exposure considered were: active and passive cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status (SES), occupational and environmental exposures related to air pollutants from vehicular traffic only. The obtained results were assessed according to the evaluation criteria on the epidemiological evidence related to the association between the outcome and exposures predefined and published by the SENTIERI working group (WG). For the evidence assessment, the SENTIERI WG criteria favoured firstly primary sources and quantitative metanalyses, secondly, consistency among sources. The evaluation of the epidemiological evidence for the association between outcome and the exposure has been classified into three categories: sufficient (S), limited (L), inadequate (I).Industries: during the period under review, six single studies evaluating the association between industrial sites exposure and the risk of CAs were found. The epidemiological evidence of association between outcome and exposure has been considered limited. Mines: from the bibliographic research, three single studies investigating possible cause-effect relationship between maternal residential proximity to mines and the risk of CAs have been collected providing inadequate epidemiological evidence. Landfills: during the period under review, one systematic review and one literature review evaluating the causal associations between maternal residential proximity to landfills and CAs were identified. The epidemiological evidence is limited and concerns almost exclusively sites containing industrial or hazardous waste. Incinerators: a systematic review has been selected; it concludes that the evidence for the association between maternal residential proximity to incinerators and CAs are inadequate. Cigarette smoking: the literature search identified eight systematic reviews with metanalysis, five multicentre studies, and ten single studies assessing the causal association between maternal and/or paternal exposure to smoking and the risk of CAs in the offspring providing sufficient evidence for a causal association between maternal exposure to cigarette smoke and the risk of congenital heart defects, oro-facial clefts, neural tube defects, and gastrointestinal malformations. Alcohol: three systematic reviews with metanalysis, two metanalyses, one multicentre study, and four single studies were collected for the period under review. The acquired literature has provided limited epidemiological evidence for associations between alcohol consumption and CAs in the nervous system, particularly for anencephaly and spina bifida. Socioeconomic status: the evidence of an association with socioeconomic factors was inadequate due to an insufficient number of studies selected during the period under consideration. Occupational exposure: the literature search collected one metanalysis, eight multicentre studies, and five single studies. The epidemiological evidence for associations between paternal occupational exposure to solvents and neural tube defects and between maternal pesticide exposure and gold-facial clefts were judged limited. Air pollution: two systematic reviews with metanalyses, two multicentre studies, and nine single studies were selected by literature search; the epidemiological evidence for a causal association between air pollutants exposure and the risk of CAs is still to be considered limited.For future epidemiological studies, a better exposure assessment, using in particular more accurate spatial measurements or models, a standardized case definition, a larger sample and more accurate control of the recognized or presumed confounding variables are needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ding应助坚强的茗茗采纳,获得10
1秒前
LXQ发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
港岛妹妹应助博修采纳,获得10
4秒前
万能图书馆应助pzy采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
fff完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
专一的幻儿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
今后应助animenz采纳,获得10
8秒前
阿俊完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
GT发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
anny2022发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
炼丹完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
kyt发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
mingyue应助眼睛大涵柳采纳,获得10
13秒前
李爱国应助顾难摧采纳,获得10
14秒前
嗡嗡完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
煜钧发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
Yziii应助发嗲的炳采纳,获得20
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
蓝天完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
nn发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
1266关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
21秒前
Goldensun发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
hhhhh发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
良辰应助大意的可冥采纳,获得10
24秒前
26秒前
研友_EZ1aNZ关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
扁舟灬完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
帅气的祥发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
高分求助中
Rock-Forming Minerals, Volume 3C, Sheet Silicates: Clay Minerals 2000
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 910
Development of general formulas for bolted flanges, by E.O. Waters [and others] 600
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3264055
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2904291
关于积分的说明 8329474
捐赠科研通 2574503
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1399136
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 654433
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 633095