[The risk prediction models for occurrence of cervical cancer: a systematic review].

检查表 宫颈癌 医学 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 样本量测定 预测建模 梅德林 癌症 统计 计算机科学 内科学 机器学习 数学 心理学 认知心理学 法学 政治学
作者
Bingjie He,W Y Chen,L L Liu,Haiyan Zhu,Haozhe Cheng,Y X Zhang,S F Wang,Siyan Zhan
出处
期刊:PubMed 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200806-01031
摘要

Objective: To systematically summarize and assess risk prediction models for occurrence of cervical cancer and to provide evidence for selecting the most reliable model for practice, and guide cervical cancer screening. Methods: Two groups of keywords related to cervical cancer and risk prediction model were searched on Chinese databases (CNKI, and Wanfang) and English databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library). Original articles that developed or validated risk prediction models and published before November 21, 2019, were selected. Information form was created based on the CHARMS checklist. The PROBAST was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: 12 eligible articles were identified, describing 15 prediction models, of which five were established in China. The predicted outcomes included multiple stages from cervical precancerous lesions to cancer occurrence, i.e., abnormal Pap smear (1), occurrence or recurrence of CIN (9), and occurrence of cervical cancer (5), etc. The most frequently used predictors were HPV infection (12), age (7), smoking (5), and education (5). There were two models using machine learning to develop models. In terms of model performance, the discrimination ranged from 0.53 to 0.87, while only two models assessed the calibration correctly. Only two models were externally validated in Taiwan of China, using people in different periods. All of the models were at high risk of bias, especially in the analysis domain. The problems were concentrated in the improper handling of missing data (13), preliminary evaluation of model performance (13), improper use of internal validation (12), and insufficient sample size (11). In addition, the problems of inconsistency measurements of predictors and outcomes (8) and the flawed report of the use of blindness for outcome measures (8) were also severe. Compared with the other models, the Rothberg (2018) model had relatively high quality. Conclusions: There are a certain number of cervical cancer risk prediction models, but the quality is poor. It is urgent to improve the measurement of predictors and outcomes, the statistical analysis details such as handling missing data and evaluation of model performance and externally validate existing models to better guide screening.目的: 系统评价宫颈癌发病风险预测模型的现况,为实践工作选择最合适的模型提供证据,指导宫颈癌筛查。 方法: 以宫颈癌和风险预测模型相关的两组中英文关键词,分别检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台及PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library,筛选截至2019年11月21日发表构建或验证宫颈癌发病模型相关文献。根据CHARMS清单制定提取表,以PROBAST工具评估偏倚风险。 结果: 共纳入12篇文献,涉及15个模型,其中5个模型在中国构建。预测结局包含从宫颈癌前病变到癌症发生的多个阶段宫颈涂片异常(1)、CIN的发生或复发(9)、宫颈癌发生(5)。使用较多的预测因素为HPV感染(12)、年龄(7)、吸烟(5)和文化程度(5)。有2个模型采用机器学习建模。模型表现上,区分度范围为0.53~0.87,而校准度只有2个模型正确评价。仅2个模型在中国台湾地区利用不同时间段的人群进行了外部验证。偏倚风险评价发现所有模型均为高风险,尤其分析领域,问题集中在缺失数据处理不当(13)、模型表现评价不完整(13)、内部验证使用不当(12)和样本量不足(11)。另外,预测因素和结局测量不一致(8)、结局测量盲法使用情况未报告(8)的问题较突出。相对而言,Rothberg等(2018)的模型质量较高。 结论: 宫颈癌发病风险预测模型有一定数量但质量较差,亟须提高预测因素与结局的测量以及缺失数据处理和模型表现评价等统计分析细节,对现有模型进行外部验证,以更好地指导筛查。.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
圆锥香蕉给ZEcholy的求助进行了留言
7秒前
jisujun发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
李小宁发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
10秒前
Stroeve发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
欧阳月空完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
星辰大海应助李小宁采纳,获得10
12秒前
段一帆发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
冷艳的姿发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
FIN应助小小采纳,获得30
13秒前
领导范儿应助su采纳,获得10
14秒前
Candy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Rondab应助xiaosu采纳,获得10
15秒前
CodeCraft应助LJJ采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
SYLH应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
17秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
张金蝶完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
CAOHOU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
CAOHOU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
SYLH应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
CAOHOU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
Lyuhng+1完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
大个应助十九岁的时差采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989334
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531428
关于积分的说明 11253936
捐赠科研通 3270119
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804887
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882087
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809173