医学
子宫颈
随机对照试验
系统回顾
宫颈癌
荟萃分析
科克伦图书馆
鳞状上皮内病变
阶段(地层学)
宫颈上皮内瘤变
安慰剂
癌症
肿瘤科
内科学
妇科
梅德林
病理
替代医学
法学
古生物学
生物
政治学
作者
A. L. Unanyan,L.G. Pivazyan,Julia Davydova,K.K. Murvatova,Alyona Khrapkova,Roman Movsisyan,А.А. Ищенко,А.И. Ищенко
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102530
摘要
We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in cervical epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and early-stage cervical cancer. Additionally, according to the results, we tried to consider which stage of CIN is more sensitive to PDT. A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria: all patients had confirmed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), or an early-stage cervical cancer – the cancer is less than 3 mm deep into the cervix -IA; type of photosensitizer and any type of wavelength. Exclusion criteria: women who were previously treated with PDT; Risk of bias assessment was carried out for each study included in the systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: RoB-2 was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized studies, while ROBINS-I – in non-randomized ones. We identified 2213 publications, but only 6 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. PDT is most effective when patients have CIN 2 or photosensitizer is administered intravenously. Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, it could be concluded that photodynamic therapy may be a practical approach in CIN (LSIL) regression compared with placebo. Nevertheless, we need more evidence and long-term follow-up to answer all questions thoroughly.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI