磁刺激
冲程(发动机)
物理医学与康复
脑刺激
随机对照试验
医学
经颅直流电刺激
忽视
康复
荟萃分析
刺激
心理学
物理疗法
听力学
内科学
精神科
工程类
机械工程
作者
F. Kashiwagi,Regina El Dib,Huda Gomaa,Nermeen Gawish,Érica Aranha Suzumura,Taís Regina da Silva,Fernanda Cristina Winckler,Juli Thomaz de Souza,Adriana Bastos Conforto,Gustavo José Luvizutto,Rodrigo Bazán
摘要
Background. Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is the most frequent perceptual disorder after stroke. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a tool that has been used in the rehabilitation process to modify cortical excitability and improve perception and functional capacity. Objective. To assess the impact of NIBS on USN after stroke. Methods. An extensive search was conducted up to July 2016. Studies were selected if they were controlled and noncontrolled trials examining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and theta burst stimulation (TBS) in USN after stroke, with outcomes measured by standardized USN and functional tests. Results. Twelve RCTs (273 participants) and 4 non-RCTs (94 participants) proved eligible. We observed a benefit in overall USN measured by the line bisection test with NIBS in comparison to sham (SMD −2.35, 95% CI −3.72, −0.98; p=0.0001); the rTMS yielded results that were consistent with the overall meta-analysis (SMD −2.82, 95% CI −3.66, −1.98; p=0.09). The rTMS compared with sham also suggested a benefit in overall USN measured by Motor-Free Visual Perception Test at both 1 Hz (SMD 1.46, 95% CI 0.73, 2.20; p<0.0001) and 10 Hz (SMD 1.19, 95% CI 0.48, 1.89; p=0.54). There was also a benefit in overall USN measured by Albert’s test and the line crossing test with 1 Hz rTMS compared to sham (SMD 2.04, 95% CI 1.14, 2.95; p<0.0001). Conclusions. The results suggest a benefit of NIBS on overall USN, and we conclude that rTMS is more efficacious compared to sham for USN after stroke.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI