陶伦斯创意思维测验
心理学
创造力
资质
发散思维
考试(生物学)
收敛性思维
创造性思维
构造(python库)
标准化测试
认知心理学
发展心理学
数学教育
社会心理学
古生物学
生物
程序设计语言
计算机科学
标识
DOI:10.1177/0013164404263883
摘要
This study compared scores on two divergent thinking tests, the Verbal and the Figural Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking(TTCT), with scores on two creativity interest inventories, Davis’s How Do You Think? and Raudsepp’s How Creative Are You? The creativity interest inventories showed weak correlations with the Verbal TTCT and no correlations with the Figural TTCT. The two interest inventories showed a strong intercorrelation, but the Verbal and Figural TTCTs were only moderately intercorrelated. These interrelationships were not substantially affected by controlling for standardized academic test scores. A principal components analysis of the subscale scores on the four tests resulted in three factors: Interests and Attitudes, Verbal Divergent Thinking, and Figural Divergent Thinking. These results provide evidence that creative interest inventories are not measuring the same construct as divergent thinking tests and that both are distinct from academic aptitude/achievement. They also support the contention that divergent thinking is multidimensional.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI