混合功能
氧化铁
密度泛函理论
晶格常数
带隙
氧化物
电子结构
材料科学
相(物质)
格子(音乐)
电子波段
吉布斯自由能
化学
热力学
计算化学
物理
凝聚态物理
量子力学
冶金
有机化学
衍射
声学
作者
Yu Meng,Xingwu Liu,Chun‐Fang Huo,Wenping Guo,Dong‐Bo Cao,Qing Peng,Albert K. Dearden,Xavier Gonze,Yong Yang,Jianguo Wang,Haijun Jiao,Yongwang Li,Xiaodong Wen
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00640
摘要
Three density functional approximations (DFAs), PBE, PBE+U, and Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof screened hybrid functional (HSE), were employed to investigate the geometric, electronic, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties of four iron oxides, namely, α-FeOOH, α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and FeO. Comparing our calculated results with available experimental data, we found that HSE (a = 0.15) (containing 15% "screened" Hartree–Fock exchange) can provide reliable values of lattice constants, Fe magnetic moments, band gaps, and formation energies of all four iron oxides, while standard HSE (a = 0.25) seriously overestimates the band gaps and formation energies. For PBE+U, a suitable U value can give quite good results for the electronic properties of each iron oxide, but it is challenging to accurately get other properties of the four iron oxides using the same U value. Subsequently, we calculated the Gibbs free energies of transformation reactions among iron oxides using the HSE (a = 0.15) functional and plotted the equilibrium phase diagrams of the iron oxide system under various conditions, which provide reliable theoretical insight into the phase transformations of iron oxides.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI