Composite Lung Transplant Suitability Score (CLaSS): A Novel Predictor of Survival Following Lung Transplantation

医学 单变量 逻辑回归 内科学 单变量分析 肺移植 移植 多元分析 多元统计 统计 数学
作者
Glen P. Westall,Hayley Barnes,Louise Fuller,Jane Harris,Christie Emsley,Greg Snell,B. Levvey,Toby Winton‐Brown
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:41 (4): S145-S145
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.340
摘要

Purpose Lung transplantation is indicated in patients with respiratory failure who progress despite optimal therapy. The selection of suitable transplant recipients considers internationally accepted absolute and relative contra-indications that are known to negatively influence survival, and typically involves a multi-disciplinary assessment. We assessed the impact on routinely collected pre-transplant variables on post-transplant survival and created a composite model that predicted post-transplant survival. Methods Adult patients (n = 916) undergoing lung transplant assessment at a single center between 2013 and 2021 had the following variables analyzed: age, gender, pre-transplant diagnosis, BMI, eGFR, HbA1c, albumin, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) score. Logistic regression was performed for post-transplant survival. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Variables for inclusion in the final model were selected using backward elimination and confirmed using forward elimination (p-value <0.1). Internal validation of the model was performed using-one-out cross validation and 70/30 data split. Results Variables as assessed by univariate analysis predicting worse survival included pre-transplant diagnosis (CLAD), limited renal reserve and reduced 6MWD, with CLAD and 6MWD remaining significant predictors of death in the multivariate analysis. All variables were initially included in the predictive model, however the model performance improved with the selective inclusion of pre-transplant diagnosis, 6MWD and HbA1c (ROC 0.672, sensitivity 98.7%). Case examples demonstrated the practical utility of the model. Scenario #1. CF, HbA1c 5, Albumin 40 and 6MWD 400m; predicted probability of survival is 85%. Scenario #2. CLAD, HbA1c 5, albumin 20, 6MWD 250m; predicted probability of survival is 36%. Conclusion Using variables that are commonly collected during a pre-transplant assessment, we have created a clinically applicable model that predicts post-transplant survival. The model can aid in recipient selection and inform discussion with potential transplant candidates on expected post-transplant outcomes, including survival. Lung transplantation is indicated in patients with respiratory failure who progress despite optimal therapy. The selection of suitable transplant recipients considers internationally accepted absolute and relative contra-indications that are known to negatively influence survival, and typically involves a multi-disciplinary assessment. We assessed the impact on routinely collected pre-transplant variables on post-transplant survival and created a composite model that predicted post-transplant survival. Adult patients (n = 916) undergoing lung transplant assessment at a single center between 2013 and 2021 had the following variables analyzed: age, gender, pre-transplant diagnosis, BMI, eGFR, HbA1c, albumin, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) score. Logistic regression was performed for post-transplant survival. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Variables for inclusion in the final model were selected using backward elimination and confirmed using forward elimination (p-value <0.1). Internal validation of the model was performed using-one-out cross validation and 70/30 data split. Variables as assessed by univariate analysis predicting worse survival included pre-transplant diagnosis (CLAD), limited renal reserve and reduced 6MWD, with CLAD and 6MWD remaining significant predictors of death in the multivariate analysis. All variables were initially included in the predictive model, however the model performance improved with the selective inclusion of pre-transplant diagnosis, 6MWD and HbA1c (ROC 0.672, sensitivity 98.7%). Case examples demonstrated the practical utility of the model. Scenario #1. CF, HbA1c 5, Albumin 40 and 6MWD 400m; predicted probability of survival is 85%. Scenario #2. CLAD, HbA1c 5, albumin 20, 6MWD 250m; predicted probability of survival is 36%. Using variables that are commonly collected during a pre-transplant assessment, we have created a clinically applicable model that predicts post-transplant survival. The model can aid in recipient selection and inform discussion with potential transplant candidates on expected post-transplant outcomes, including survival.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yuaasusanaann发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
guoke完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
georgia_qiao完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
5秒前
6秒前
粥喝不喝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
汪汪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
karL完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Adon完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
Cuillli发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小马甲应助硕心采纳,获得10
12秒前
yydragen应助七月流火采纳,获得50
13秒前
13秒前
15秒前
夕夕口口发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
Chao123_完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
香蕉觅云应助shi采纳,获得10
19秒前
龚幻梦发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
天天快乐应助轻松的贞采纳,获得10
20秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
玉ER完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
幽默梦之完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
SMHILU发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助jerry采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
yydragen应助弥生妖刀采纳,获得30
26秒前
无恙发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
慕青应助lqy采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
Cuillli完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
酷波er应助SMHILU采纳,获得10
28秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助林洛沁采纳,获得10
29秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Effective Learning and Mental Wellbeing 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975953
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520269
关于积分的说明 11201866
捐赠科研通 3256738
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798436
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877578
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806464