肺动脉导管
肝移植
医学
心输出量
肺动脉
移植
心脏病学
内科学
血管阻力
心脏移植
血流动力学
麻醉
作者
Yutaka Murata,Takumi Imai,Chikashi Takeda,Toshiyuki Mizota,Shuji Kawamoto
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-14988-z
摘要
Abstract In liver transplantation for end-stage liver failure, monitoring of continuous cardiac output (CCO) is used for circulatory management due to hemodynamic instability. CCO is often measured using the minimally invasive FloTrac/Vigileo system (FVS-CCO), instead of a highly invasive pulmonary artery catheter (PAC-CCO). The FVS has improved accuracy due to an updated cardiac output algorithm, but the effect of this change on the accuracy of FVS-CCO in liver transplantation is unclear. In this study, we assessed agreement between fourth-generation FVS-CCO and PAC-CCO in 20 patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent scheduled or emergency liver transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital from September 2019 to June 2021. Consent was obtained before surgery and data were recorded throughout the surgical period. Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ), Bland–Altman and 4-quadrant plot analyses were performed on the extracted data. A total of 1517 PAC-CCO vs. FVS-CCO data pairs were obtained. The mean PAC-CCO was 8.73 L/min and the mean systemic vascular resistance was 617.5 dyne·s·cm -5 , r was 0.48, bias was 1.62 L/min, the 95% limits of agreement were − 3.04 to 6.27, and the percentage error was 54.36%. These results show that agreement and trending between fourth-generation FVS-CCO and PAC-CCO are low in adult liver transplant recipients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI