A systematic review of the content and quality of clinical practice guidelines for management of the neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury

医学 脊髓损伤 脊髓 临床实习 系统回顾 梅德林 重症监护医学 物理疗法 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Peter Bragge,Stacey Guy,Mark Boulet,Eraj Ghafoori,Denise Goodwin,Breanna Wright
出处
期刊:Spinal Cord [Springer Nature]
卷期号:57 (7): 540-549 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41393-019-0278-0
摘要

Neurogenic bladder following acute spinal cord injury (SCI) increases urinary tract infection (UTI) risk and affects quality of life and health system costs. This study aimed to identify, describe and evaluate quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for managing neurogenic bladder following SCI. A comprehensive search covered six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Health Systems Evidence, Cochrane, CINAHL, Epistomonikos) and 12 CPG portals. Inclusion criteria were English language CPG; includes recommendations for managing neurogenic bladder in adults; all phases of care; published 2011 onwards in peer-reviewed journal/CPG portal. For eligible CPGs, key characteristics including years covered by CPG searching and number of neurogenic bladder recommendations were extracted. Quality appraisal used the AGREE II instrument. Appraiser agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Searching yielded 4028 citations and eight relevant CPGs. Collectively the CPGs contained 304 recommendations. Over half (160) pertained to assessment, surgery or education. Most surgery recommendations were from older CPGs; more recent CPGs emphasised conservative therapy. Methodological quality across CPGs was good in the domains of 'clarity of presentation' (84% mean domain score), 'scope and purpose' (72%) and 'editorial independence' (68%). There were shortcomings in the domains of 'rigor of development' (52%) 'stakeholder involvement' (42%) and 'applicability' (33%). CPGs for the management of neurogenic bladder following SCI are generally robust in stating their scope and clearly presenting recommendations. Only three CPGs attained domain scores over 70% pertaining to methodological rigor. Future CPGs should also focus on providing implementation / audit resources and incorporating patient perspectives.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lizishu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
lizishu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
鹅鹅鹅完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
曾经不言完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
罗赛应助222222采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
幽壑之潜蛟应助222222采纳,获得10
3秒前
彭于晏应助222222采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助fzy采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
数乱了梨花完成签到 ,获得积分0
4秒前
隐形曼青应助加顿土豆采纳,获得10
5秒前
tcheng发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
药猜猜麻完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
晨曦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
hhxyhjh完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
答辩发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
chuzihang完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
辉哥发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
整齐冬瓜完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
tcheng完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
huxuehong完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
早日发论文完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
狸子完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
222222完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
23秒前
跳跃白云完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
jinyue完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
xiaobai123456发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
HD发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
27秒前
武映易完成签到 ,获得积分0
27秒前
小任同学要努力完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
无辜箴发布了新的文献求助30
28秒前
Ellie完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Yangtze Reminiscences. Some Notes And Recollections Of Service With The China Navigation Company Ltd., 1925-1939 800
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 600
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Psychological Well-being The Complexities of Mental and Emotional Health 500
T/SNFSOC 0002—2025 独居石精矿碱法冶炼工艺技术标准 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5856976
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6325829
关于积分的说明 15635525
捐赠科研通 4971307
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2681407
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1625348
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1582328