医学
卡铂
西妥昔单抗
人口
头颈部鳞状细胞癌
内科学
彭布罗利珠单抗
顺铂
中期分析
肿瘤科
头颈部癌
核医学
泌尿科
放射治疗
随机对照试验
癌症
化疗
结直肠癌
免疫疗法
环境卫生
作者
Danny Rischin,Kevin J. Harrington,Richard Greil,Denis Soulières,Makoto Tahara,Gilberto de Castro,Amanda Psyrri,Neus Basté,Prakash Neupane,Åse Bratland,Thorsten Fuereder,Brett Hughes,Ricard Mesı́a,Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon,Tamara Rordorf,Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak,Yayan Zhang,Fan Jin,Burak Gümüşçü,Barbara Burtness
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.6000
摘要
6000 Background: KEYNOTE-048 is a phase 3 study of P or P + chemo (C) vs EXTREME (E) as 1L therapy for R/M HNSCC (NCT02358031). At the second interim analysis (IA2), P significantly improved OS in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 and ≥1 populations and had noninferior OS in the total population with favorable safety; P+C significantly improved OS in the total population with comparable safety. We present the protocol-specified final results. Methods: 882 pts with locally incurable R/M HNSCC and no prior systemic therapy in the R/M setting who provided a tumor sample for PD-L1 testing were randomized to P 200 mg Q3W for 24 mo (n = 301), P for 24 mo + 6 cycles of C (cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 or carboplatin AUC 5 Q3W + 5-FU 1000 mg/m 2 /d for 4 d Q3W) (n = 281), or E (cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 loading/250 mg/m 2 QW + 6 cycles of chemo) (n = 300). OS superiority was tested sequentially for P+C vs E in the CPS ≥20 population, then the CPS ≥1 population, and for P vs E in the total population (superiority thresholds: one-sided P = .0023, .0026, and .0059, respectively). Data cutoff was 25 Feb 2019 (~25 mo after last pt randomized). Results: P+C significantly improved OS vs E in the CPS ≥20 (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.82, P = .0004; median 14.7 vs 11.0 mo) and CPS ≥1 (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.80, P < .0001; median 13.6 vs 10.4 mo) populations. HR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.76 (0.58-1.01) for CPS ≥20 and 0.84 (0.69-1.02) for CPS ≥1. ORR (P+C vs E) was 42.9% vs 38.2% for CPS ≥20 and 36.4% vs 35.7% for CPS ≥1; median DOR was 7.1 vs 4.2 mo and 6.7 vs 4.3 mo, respectively. P did not significantly improve OS vs E in the total population (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, P = .0199; median 11.5 vs 10.7 mo). HR (95% CI) for PFS was 1.29 (1.09-1.53). ORR (P vs E) was 16.9% vs 36.0%; median DOR was 22.6 vs 4.5 mo. All-cause gr 3-5 AE rates were 54.7% for P, 85.1% for P+C, and 83.3% for E. Conclusion: Overall, KEYNOTE-048 showed that compared with E, P+C had superior OS in the PD-L1 CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, and total populations with comparable safety and P had superior OS in the CPS ≥20 and ≥1 populations, noninferior OS in the total population, and favorable safety. These results support pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU as new 1L standards of care for R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02358031.