作者
Ahmet Uluer,Gordon MacGregor,Pilar Azevedo,V. Indihar,Claire Keating,Marcus Mall,Edward F. McKone,Bonnie W. Ramsey,Steven M. Rowe,Ronald C. Rubenstein,Jennifer L. Taylor‐Cousar,Elizabeth Tullis,Lael M. Yonker,Chenghao Chu,Anna Lam,Nitin Nair,Patrick R. Sosnay,Simon Tian,Fredrick Van Goor,Lakshmi Viswanathan,David Waltz,Linda T. Wang,Yingmei Xi,Joanne Billings,Alexander Horsley,Alexander Horsley,Edward F. Nash,Marleen Bakker,Renske van der Meer,Petrus Merkus,Christof J. Majoor,Karen McCoy,Joanne Billings,Krishna Pancham,James Tolle,Bryon Quick,Ahmet Uluer,Emily DiMango,Adupa P. Rao,Santiago Reyes,Ross C. Klingsberg,Celeste Barreto,Victor E. Ortega,Donna Beth Willey‐Courand,C. Schwarz,Sivagurunathan Sutharsan,Rainald Fischer,Jane Davies,J. Duckers,Alexander Horsley,Simon Doe,Edward F. Nash,Marleen Bakker,Harry G.M. Heijerman,Renske van der Meer,Petrus Merkus,Christof J. Majoor,George M. Solomon,Christian A. Merlo,Jennifer Griffonnet,Joseph M. Pilewski,Jordan Dunitz,Saba Sheikh,Ronald C. Rubenstein,Daniel Rosenbluth,Theodore G. Liou,Maria Veronica Indihar,Krishna Pancham,Lael M. Yonker,Samya Z. Nasr,Jennifer Griffonnet,Cynthia Brown,Gregory S. Sawicki,Jennifer Ruddy,Emily DiMango,Bryan Garcia,Andrew T. Braun,Alex H. Gifford,Nighat Mehdi,Maria Tupayachi Ortiz,Raksha Jain,Francisco J. Calimano,Jimmy Johannes,Cori Daines,Jason Fullmer,Joel Mermis,Christopher Barrios,Ngoc P. Ly,Brian Casserly,Stephan Eisenmann,Helge Hebestreit,Alexander Kiefer,Sivagurunathan Sutharsan,Rainald Fischer,Gordon MacGregor,Daniel Peckham,M.J. Ledson,Eva Van Braeckel,Petrus Merkus,Noel G. McElvaney,Edward F. McKone,Barry J. Plant,Lucy Burr,Daniel J. Smıth,Peter G. Middleton,John W. Wilson
摘要
Background Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been shown to be safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele.Our aim was to identify a novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator combination capable of further increasing CFTR-mediated chloride transport, with the potential for once-daily dosing. MethodsWe conducted two phase 2 clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of a once-daily combination of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in participants with cystic fibrosis who were aged 18 years or older.A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study (VX18-561-101; April 17, 2019, to Aug 20, 2020) was carried out to compare deutivacaftor monotherapy with ivacaftor monotherapy in participants with CFTR gating mutations, following a 4-week ivacaftor monotherapy run-in period.Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h, deutivacaftor 25 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 50 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily, or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily in a 1:1:2:2:2 ratio.The primary endpoint was absolute change in ppFEV₁ from baseline at week 12.A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, controlled, proof-of-concept study of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (VX18-121-101; April 30, 2019, to Dec 10, 2019) was conducted in participants with cystic fibrosis and heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation (F/MF genotypes) or homozygous for F508del (F/F genotype).Participants with F/MF genotypes were randomly assigned 1:2:2:1 to receive either 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg of vanzacaftor in combination with tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or a triple placebo for 4 weeks, and participants with the F/F genotype were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor active control for 4 weeks, following a 4-week tezacaftor-ivacaftor run-in period.Primary endpoints for part 1 and part 2 were safety and tolerability and absolute change in ppFEV 1 from baseline to day 29.Secondary efficacy endpoints were absolute change from baseline at day 29 in sweat chloride concentrations and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score.These clinical trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03911713 and NCT03912233, and are complete.Findings In study VX18-561-101, participants treated with deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily (n=23) or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily (n=24) had mean absolute changes in ppFEV₁ of 3•1 percentage points (95% CI -0•8 to 7•0) and 2•7 percentage points (-1•0 to 6•5) from baseline at week 12, respectively, versus -0•8 percentage points (-6•2 to 4•7) with ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h (n=11); the deutivacaftor safety profile was consistent with the established safety profile of ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h.In study VX18-121-101, participants with F/MF genotypes treated with vanzacaftor (5 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=9), vanzacaftor (10 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=19), vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=20), and placebo (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline at day 29 in ppFEV₁ of 4•6 percentage points (-1•3 to 10•6), 14•2 percentage points (10•0 to 18•4), 9•8 percentage points (5•7 to 13•8), and 1•9 percentage points (-4•1 to 8•0), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -42•8 mmol/L (-51•7 to -34•0), -45•8 mmol/L (95% CI -51•9 to -39•7), -49•5 mmol/L (-55•9 to -43•1), and 2•3 mmol/L (-7•0 to 11•6), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 17•6 points (3•5 to 31•6), 21•2 points (11•9 to 30•6), 29•8 points (21•0 to 38•7), and 3•3 points (-10•1 to 16•6), respectively.Participants with the F/F genotype treated with vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=18) and tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline (taking tezacaftor-ivacaftor) at day 29 in ppFEV₁ of 15•9 percentage points (11•3 to 20•6) and -0•1 percentage points (-6•4 to 6•1), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -45•5 mmol/L (-49•7 to -41•3) and -2•6 mmol/L (-8•2 to 3•1), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 19•4 points (95% CI 10•5 to 28•3) and -5•0 points (-16•9 to 7•0), respectively.The most common adverse events overall were cough, increased sputum, and headache.One participant in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group had a serious adverse event of infective pulmonary exacerbation and another participant had a serious rash event that led to treatment discontinuation.For most participants, adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.www.thelancet.com/respiratory