Efficacy and safety of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies in current Alzheimer's disease phase III clinical trials: A systematic review and interactive web app-based meta-analysis

The risk-benefit profile of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear, especially concerning their safety and overall effects on AD progression and cognitive function. Here, we investigated cognitive, biomarker and side effects of anti-Aβ mAbs in large phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in sporadic AD. The search was performed on Google Scholar, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov by applying Jadad score to evaluate the methodological quality of the reports. Studies were excluded if they scored < 3 on Jadad scale or if they analyzed less than 200 sporadic AD patients. We followed PRISMA guidelines and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model in R. Primary outcomes were cognitive: AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). Secondary and tertiary outcomes included biomarkers of Aβ and tau pathology, adverse events, and performance on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living Scale. The meta-analysis included 14,980 patients in 14 studies and four mAbs: Bapineuzumab, Aducanumab, Solanezumab and Lecanemab. The results of this study suggest that anti-Aβ mAbs statistically improved cognitive and biomarker outcomes, particularly Aducanumab and Lecanemab. However, while cognitive effects were of small effect sizes, these drugs considerably increased risk of side effects such as Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), especially in APOE-ε4 carriers. Meta-regression revealed that higher (better) baseline MMSE score was associated with improved ADAS Cog and CDR-SB. In order to improve reproducibility and update the analysis in the future, we developed AlzMeta.app, web-based application freely available at https://alzmetaapp.shinyapps.io/alzmeta/.