Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.4的应助被nnn采纳,获得10
刚刚
852的应助被bb88采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
肖未央发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
大模型的应助被烦烦烦采纳,获得10
2秒前
陶醉寒珊发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
机智沛蓝的应助被如意幼枫采纳,获得10
2秒前
无极微光的应助被迷人念柏采纳,获得20
2秒前
在水一方的应助被球球采纳,获得10
2秒前
斯文汲发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
慕青的应助被付小肥采纳,获得10
3秒前
小鱼爱吃肉的应助被付小肥采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被小黄花采纳,获得10
3秒前
华仔的应助被化小凡采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
务实的姿完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
木mu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
牧歌发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
chm发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
邢邢原硕发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
悦耳的怀寒的应助被如意幼枫采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
wer发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
慕青的应助被卷卷233611采纳,获得10
8秒前
万能图书馆的应助被等等等等采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研变成狗完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
liuyang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
SciGPT的应助被xwt3628采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
烟花的应助被yl采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
Cui发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
777完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Akim的应助被shee采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Art of Interactive Teaching 600
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7799721
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9334773
关于积分的说明 20469252
捐赠科研通 7390914
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3326165
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2473153
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2343844