已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.4的应助被小白长虫采纳,获得10
刚刚
哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
SF完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
JamesPei的应助被zysn采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
马晓宇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Lu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
ypqisgood完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
哇哇哇哇完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
玻璃杯完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
学术笨蛋发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
顺利毕业发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
双叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
午盏完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
郝晓东完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
苏利文发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
默默听白发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
852的应助被萤火采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
无印秀秀完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
上官若男的应助被热心的芝麻采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被滔滔采纳,获得10
19秒前
111发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
22秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被过眼云烟采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Erzählte Gnade 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8083435
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9498502
关于积分的说明 21407209
捐赠科研通 7651803
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3402310
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2531275
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2440928