Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
完美世界应助0000采纳,获得30
1秒前
rosexu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
爆米花应助sv采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
搞怪网络完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
liudiqiu应助lh采纳,获得10
3秒前
命运的X号发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
满座关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
FashionBoy应助侦察兵采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
个性尔槐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
esdeath完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
13504544355完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
陶醉的蜜蜂完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
坦率井完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
善学以致用应助代萌萌采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
捉迷藏应助tengli采纳,获得10
5秒前
shirleeyeahe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
kunny完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
闻声完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zqfxc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
zhuxl完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
威康宇宙完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
cchen0902发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
在水一方应助cmh采纳,获得10
9秒前
一年能吃800篇sci吗完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
慕青应助ww采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
rosexu完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
jhlz5879完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
百宝发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527849
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107938
关于积分的说明 9287239
捐赠科研通 2805706
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716893
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709794