Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lxydream发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
领导范儿应助liva采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
粗心的丹萱完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
南施闻发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
小斌发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
心灵尔安发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
xt完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
西方印迹大王完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Holder发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
CodeCraft应助liva采纳,获得10
8秒前
李健应助STP顶峰相见采纳,获得10
9秒前
嘿嘿应助等待书桃采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
赘婿应助等待书桃采纳,获得10
9秒前
爆米花应助等待书桃采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Orange应助等待书桃采纳,获得10
9秒前
领导范儿应助等待书桃采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
wanci应助Once采纳,获得10
11秒前
可爱的函函应助liva采纳,获得10
11秒前
彭于晏应助生气的鸡蛋采纳,获得10
11秒前
ttttttttttt完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
起风了发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
斯文败类应助liva采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
bkagyin应助阿土采纳,获得10
15秒前
haihaiov完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
AlinaLee完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Horizon应助哈哈哈哈哈采纳,获得10
17秒前
粽子大王完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
The Oxford Handbook of Digital Classical Studies 550
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7618235
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9193500
关于积分的说明 19704332
捐赠科研通 7190711
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3272203
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434900
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2267412