Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
gc55发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
辣椒油发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
铠甲勇士发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小二郎应助sing采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
5秒前
ZhouJing发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小黑米采纳,获得10
6秒前
xuelanghu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
酷酷的盼山完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
泡椒21发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
哒哒发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
dwr168发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
13秒前
14秒前
ywyw完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
小马甲应助内向的子默采纳,获得30
17秒前
18秒前
Lucas应助塞外江南采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI6.3应助粥粥采纳,获得10
20秒前
谢有能发布了新的文献求助30
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
dwr168完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
freya发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
李健的小迷弟应助你好采纳,获得10
22秒前
nature发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
星辰大海应助卫周威采纳,获得10
27秒前
djdj放技能发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
30秒前
七七发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
nature完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7596766
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9173268
关于积分的说明 19638346
捐赠科研通 7173954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268130
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432770
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261378