Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Drlouis完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
jack发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
风止意难平完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
愚人完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Orange的应助被NX_HAOCHEN采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
ACMI发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
molihuakai的应助被不见高山采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
奋斗靖仇发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小柚完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
困困包完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
cdercder的应助被不万能青年采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
ACMI完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
luke发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被大珂学家采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
陈锦雯发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
坦率的柏柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
荣zl完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
xxx关注了科研通微信公众号
22秒前
淡然冬灵发布了新的文献求助200
22秒前
吴一凡发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
NX_HAOCHEN发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
liangwanwan发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
31秒前
烟花的应助被如意雁兰采纳,获得10
33秒前
rover完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
白衣卿相发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
江涸完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Ning_完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
赘婿的应助被xpy采纳,获得10
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Student's Guide to Social Neuroscience 600
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7811262
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9342785
关于积分的说明 20514574
捐赠科研通 7404114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3329662
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2476410
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2348722