Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jameson完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
clown完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
慕青应助晴天采纳,获得10
2秒前
啊宁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
郭郭完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
lehu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
打工人发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
CAPCAP发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
JJ完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
按时毕业的小王完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助科研顺利1采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
犯困的溪南完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
麦麦完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
虚幻灵松完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王钧正发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
吴琼发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
光明磊落完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
14秒前
牧野发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
cyj完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Eden完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
满意绝音发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Lucas应助Deb采纳,获得10
16秒前
赘婿应助开放映冬采纳,获得10
16秒前
小二郎应助caidan采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI2S应助飘逸的笑白采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI6.4应助yezi采纳,获得10
16秒前
啦啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
白苹果发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
高兴的海豚完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助Eden采纳,获得10
18秒前
JamesPei应助碧蓝翅膀采纳,获得10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
Association of Reentry Well-Being with Psychological Distress, Employment, and Housing Instability 15-Months After Incarceration 500
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7026995
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8697511
关于积分的说明 18428718
捐赠科研通 6525822
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3111110
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2187996
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2086780