Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.2的应助被MAdd采纳,获得10
刚刚
寸烛驱夜完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
淮南丿老怪完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
misha发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
星河发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
SciGPT的应助被半分青蓝采纳,获得10
3秒前
欢呼的犀牛完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
shary发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Nov2发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
隐形曼青的应助被虹虹采纳,获得10
8秒前
秋风的应助被泡芙采纳,获得10
8秒前
姑且发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被大白包子采纳,获得10
12秒前
畔畔完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
12秒前
白鱼neko完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Nov2完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
哦是小可爱鸭完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
641发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
小蘑菇的应助被洋溢采纳,获得10
16秒前
Jau完成签到,获得积分0
16秒前
aaaa的应助被完美平灵采纳,获得50
16秒前
16秒前
semigreen发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
summing发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
ddk发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被Lonng采纳,获得10
19秒前
涵涵不浪费完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
小黄完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
Douxing发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Dawn of Philology 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.) 310
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7821628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9348562
关于积分的说明 20548585
捐赠科研通 7414336
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3333078
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479050
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2353343