Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
舒服的月饼完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
6秒前
CipherSage应助dwj采纳,获得10
6秒前
感性的俊驰完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
hi_traffic完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
亮亮发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Hello应助正直听白采纳,获得10
14秒前
DianaLee完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
鹿阿布完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
沙洲发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
饱满芷卉完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
小杨完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
勤恳的语蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
chun完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
痕墨笙完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
科研强完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
洛城l完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
晴天完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
shl完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
韩明轩完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
赖氨酸完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
52秒前
沙洲完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
神秘玩家完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
jhlz5879完成签到,获得积分0
57秒前
念之完成签到 ,获得积分0
57秒前
藏11完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
现实的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
姜菲菲完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
茅十八完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
四叶草完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
糟糕的翅膀完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
dwj发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
zarahn完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight Simulation, Second Edition 2500
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6512380
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8305916
关于积分的说明 17742483
捐赠科研通 5614063
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2923772
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1901035
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1762725