Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 法学 病理 政治学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Yujia发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
纳兰嫣然发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
积极的凌波完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lili发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小z完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
糊涂的雅琴应助幽默问枫采纳,获得30
5秒前
leb完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助风清扬采纳,获得30
6秒前
Ruby发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
池鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Noneone110发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Lucas应助www采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助栀子采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
皮老八发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
健忘从灵完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Roach关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
11秒前
anyilin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
molihuakai应助双子土豆泥采纳,获得10
12秒前
结实的南露完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
宇宙拿铁完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Nia完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
举了个橙子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
李健应助牛小浓采纳,获得10
13秒前
zxt发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
dd发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
东方红完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
ZZzz完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
The Immune System (Fifth Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6557699
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8341342
关于积分的说明 17871688
捐赠科研通 5676932
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940994
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1916833
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1787914