清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Krim完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
我有我风格完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
Akim应助George采纳,获得10
34秒前
babalala完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
我是笨蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
Virtual应助babalala采纳,获得20
43秒前
大医仁心完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
1分钟前
呆呆的猕猴桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
TheaGao完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
George发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
踏实数据线完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Benhnhk21完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
红枫没有微雨怜完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
慕青应助dcm采纳,获得10
3分钟前
瘦瘦的枫叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
wythu16完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
星辰大海应助Carlos_Soares采纳,获得10
4分钟前
老石完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
开心的瘦子完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
JAYZHANG完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
Carlos_Soares发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
5分钟前
Carlos_Soares完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
maher完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
asda发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
asda完成签到,获得积分20
6分钟前
呆鸥完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
ZYP应助OCDer采纳,获得80
7分钟前
7分钟前
林夕完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
合适忆丹完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
法外潮湿宝贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
分析完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
Inherited Metabolic Disease in Adults: A Clinical Guide 500
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4612350
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4017599
关于积分的说明 12436515
捐赠科研通 3699718
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2040286
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1073108
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 956819