Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

医学 哮喘 荟萃分析 安慰剂 系统回顾 临床试验 恶化 心理干预 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 儿科 替代医学 护理部 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Sofia Cividini,Ian Sinha,Sarah Donegan,Michelle Maden,Katie Rose,Olivia Fulton,Giovanna Culeddu,Dyfrig Hughes,Steve Turner,Catrin Tudur Smith
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal [European Respiratory Society]
卷期号:62 (6): 2301011-2301011 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.01011-2023
摘要

Background There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Results Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Conclusions Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
hh完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
时倾完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
清脆冬日完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
善学以致用应助Mipaa采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
积极松完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
一又二分之一完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
xieyangyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
ARESCI发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lyp发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
淡淡尔烟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Gloyxtg发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
思源应助王月帆采纳,获得10
13秒前
99668完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
小马甲应助周美言采纳,获得10
14秒前
可爱的函函应助以鹿之路采纳,获得10
14秒前
Roxanne发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
14秒前
Jasper应助星星采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
kikeva发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
情怀应助彩彩采纳,获得10
19秒前
大模型应助Heyley采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI6应助hh采纳,获得10
19秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助叶涛采纳,获得10
20秒前
海棠发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
云上完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
曦cherish完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
啊哦发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
From Victimization to Aggression 1000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Exosomes Pipeline Insight, 2025 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5649984
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4779520
关于积分的说明 15050791
捐赠科研通 4808902
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2571905
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1528157
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1486950