Fully Automated Identification of Lymph Node Metastases and Lymphovascular Invasion in Endometrial Cancer From Multi‐Parametric MRI by Deep Learning

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate identification of lymphatic node metastasis (LNM) and lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) for endometrial cancer (EC) patients is important for treatment design, but difficult on multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) images. PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning (DL) model to simultaneously identify of LNM and LVSI of EC from mpMRI images. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Six hundred twenty-one patients with histologically proven EC from two institutions, including 111 LNM-positive and 168 LVSI-positive, divided into training, internal, and external test cohorts of 398, 169, and 54 patients, respectively. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were scanned with turbo spin-echo, gradient-echo, and two-dimensional echo-planar sequences, using either a 1.5 T or 3 T system. ASSESSMENT: EC lesions were manually delineated on T2WI by two radiologists and used to train an nnU-Net model for automatic segmentation. A multi-task DL model was developed to simultaneously identify LNM and LVSI positive status using the segmented EC lesion regions and T2WI, CE-T1WI, and DWI images as inputs. The performance of the model for LNM-positive diagnosis was compared with those of three radiologists in the external test cohort. STATISTICAL TESTS: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate segmentation results. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the performance of LNM and LVSI status identification. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: EC lesion segmentation model achieved mean DSC values of 0.700 ± 0.25 and 0.693 ± 0.21 in the internal and external test cohorts, respectively. For LNM positive/LVSI positive identification, the proposed model achieved AUC values of 0.895/0.848, 0.806/0.795, and 0.804/0.728 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts, respectively, and better than those of three radiologists (AUC = 0.770/0.648/0.674). DATA CONCLUSION: The proposed model has potential to help clinicians to identify LNM and LVSI status of EC patients and improve treatment planning. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.