Comparative study on the performance of different machine learning techniques to predict the shear strength of RC deep beams: Model selection and industry implications

计算机科学 人工智能 机器学习 人工神经网络 克里金 支持向量机 随机性 高斯过程 Boosting(机器学习) 决策树 数据挖掘 高斯分布 数学 统计 量子力学 物理
作者
Khuong Le-Nguyen,Hoa T. Trinh,Thanh Trung Nguyên,Hoàng Long Nguyễn
出处
期刊:Expert Systems With Applications [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:230: 120649-120649
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120649
摘要

This study presents a comprehensive and rigorous process to develop the most appropriate machine learning (ML) model for predicting the shear strength of RC deep beams (RCDBs). The process consists of the crucial stages and state-of-the-art techniques of ML, including the development of ML models, selection of input features using Shapley Additive explanations, optimisation of the training process, assessment of data randomness, comparisons to the conventional practice codes, and development of novel web-based design platform based on the proposed ML model. For this purpose, seven machine learning models, i.e., linear regression, artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines, decision trees, ensemble of trees (EoT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were developed to predict the shear strength of RC deep beams based on a database of 518 samples with 15 input features. The four best models (i.e., ANN, EoT, XGBoost, and GPR) were then considered to assess the influence of varying the number of input features on the prediction performance. The results proved that GPR is the most reliable and accurate ML model. In addition, a set of nine optimal input features is proposed for predicting the shear strength of RCDBs. It was observed that randomly dividing the dataset into training and testing sets can significantly impact the predicted results. In some cases, the R2 value dropped to under 0.78, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the methodology for dividing the dataset when conducting machine learning experiments. The shear strength predicted by ML models was then compared with the three most prominent practice codes (i.e., ACI318, EC2, CSA 23.3-04), which indicated ML approach is highly reliable and accurate over conventional methods. In addition, the study used the Monte Carlo method to evaluate the robustness of the machine learning models and developed a user-interface platform to facilitate the practical application of the proposed machine learning model.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
马淑贤完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
坦率凤凰发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
完美世界应助闪闪婴采纳,获得10
刚刚
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
向着阳光奔跑完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
乐雾完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Stevielau发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
羊翊婕完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
yang发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
lll完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
俏皮的鹏飞完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
qiusister完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Cherry完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
llls完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
CHL完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
lant0932发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
Jessie Li完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
玖玖柒idol完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助刘真焊采纳,获得10
6秒前
Dave完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
smart完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xuening完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
辛菜头完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
YS0701完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
爱科研的方完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
随便起个吧完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
程明完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
刘小谁完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
缘缘不断发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
SilverPlane发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 500
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
DIPPR Project 801 - Full Version 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7766799
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9310665
关于积分的说明 20318532
捐赠科研通 7351898
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3315196
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464635
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2329829