电解质
锂(药物)
化学
氟化物
氟化锂
无机化学
阳极
金属
物理化学
电极
有机化学
医学
内分泌学
作者
Mingming Tao,Yuxuan Xiang,Danhui Zhao,Peizhao Shan,Yiou Sun,Yong Yang
出处
期刊:Nano Letters
[American Chemical Society]
日期:2022-08-08
卷期号:22 (16): 6775-6781
被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02484
摘要
Electrolyte optimization, such as using fluoride-bearing electrolytes, is regarded as an effective way to improve the cycle performance of lithium metal batteries (LMBs), but the promotion mechanisms of the electrolytes are in controversy due to the lack of quantitative understanding of the reaction products during cycling. Here, taking several fluorinated electrolytes as models, we use mass spectrometry titration (MST) and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques to quantify the evolution of dead Li metal, solid electrolyte interphases (SEI) and lithium hydride (LiH) during cycling. Our quantitative results clearly disclose that lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiODFB) is able to inhibit the formation of SEI and LiH while fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) mainly inhibits the formation of dead Li metal. Furthermore, we surprisingly observe a linear correlation between LiH and SEI formation, whereas the commonly mentioned lithium fluoride (LiF) shows a weak correlation with either dead Li metal or SEI. Guided by the clear failure mechanism, we can provide a reasonable explanation for the synergistic effect with the combination of LiODFB and FEC from a quantitative perspective. We believe that a quantitative insight of electrolytes on the failure mechanism of LMBs will guide us to explore the functional electrolytes to achieve the practical application of LMBs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI