Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

神经刺激 迷走神经电刺激 脑深部刺激 癫痫 荟萃分析 癫痫外科 抗药性癫痫 心理学 医学 神经科学 麻醉 迷走神经 刺激 内科学 帕金森病 疾病
作者
Zulfi Haneef,Henry C. Skrehot
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:64 (4): 811-820 被引量:46
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.17524
摘要

There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy.Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R.Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02).Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小马甲应助湖里采纳,获得10
刚刚
Sc发布了新的文献求助33
1秒前
1秒前
Myc完成签到 ,获得积分20
1秒前
2秒前
三七七七七七七七完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
diyancui发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
momo妈咪完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Ki_Ayasato完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
栗子哇呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
xss发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
cheng完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
998685发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
兽先生完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
蓝韵发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
diyancui完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Ava应助raoxray采纳,获得30
13秒前
14秒前
sue完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
深情安青应助叁叁肆采纳,获得10
17秒前
NexusExplorer应助Christyshan采纳,获得10
19秒前
阳光发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
江河日山完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
fancy发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
23秒前
23秒前
自觉德天完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
998685完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
湖里发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
西瓜妹发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 36th edition 400
Cancer Targets: Novel Therapies and Emerging Research Directions (Part 1) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6360923
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8174848
关于积分的说明 17220029
捐赠科研通 5415999
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2866110
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1843339
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1691363