Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

神经刺激 迷走神经电刺激 脑深部刺激 癫痫 荟萃分析 癫痫外科 抗药性癫痫 心理学 医学 神经科学 麻醉 迷走神经 刺激 内科学 帕金森病 疾病
作者
Zulfi Haneef,Henry C. Skrehot
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:64 (4): 811-820 被引量:46
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.17524
摘要

There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy.Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R.Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02).Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lylyly123发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
Gjjjjjjj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
4秒前
aderwe完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
mo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ww完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
误会完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
默而非问发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
奔跑应助ccilee采纳,获得10
6秒前
小东发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
南先生发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
陈雨完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
温柔的兔子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
平常莆完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
迷人的林林完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
彭于晏应助Huang采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
韶华发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
hao123完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
Mingyue123完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
LLL发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
qilin发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
锦鲤完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
旺旺发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
拼豆豆完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
搞怪的方盒完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
lilyz615发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
花满楼发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
hauward完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7524078
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9110805
关于积分的说明 19455417
捐赠科研通 7127041
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3255212
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2423273
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2242205