Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

神经刺激 迷走神经电刺激 脑深部刺激 癫痫 荟萃分析 癫痫外科 抗药性癫痫 心理学 医学 神经科学 麻醉 迷走神经 刺激 内科学 帕金森病 疾病
作者
Zulfi Haneef,Henry C. Skrehot
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:64 (4): 811-820 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.17524
摘要

There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy.Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R.Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02).Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
脑壳疼的小展完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
磕盐耇发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
笑嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Kenneyhahaha发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
宋嘉新完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
浅尝离白应助yyy采纳,获得30
5秒前
子小孙发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
共享精神应助lllkkk采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
davidhu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
缪南风完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Jason-1024完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
GillianRan给GillianRan的求助进行了留言
7秒前
7秒前
祁郁郁完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
爆米花应助研友_8Kedgn采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
汉堡包应助磕盐耇采纳,获得10
10秒前
笑点低逊发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
荀誉发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
祁郁郁发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无限冰淇淋完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
lxh完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
小郭同学发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
脑洞疼应助Kenneyhahaha采纳,获得10
16秒前
斯文败类应助Fxxkme采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
Akim应助XH采纳,获得10
18秒前
胖奥小肥仔完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3147903
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2798930
关于积分的说明 7832525
捐赠科研通 2455943
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1307025
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627966
版权声明 601587