Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

神经刺激 迷走神经电刺激 脑深部刺激 癫痫 荟萃分析 癫痫外科 抗药性癫痫 心理学 医学 神经科学 麻醉 迷走神经 刺激 内科学 帕金森病 疾病
作者
Zulfi Haneef,Henry C. Skrehot
出处
期刊:Epilepsia [Wiley]
卷期号:64 (4): 811-820 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1111/epi.17524
摘要

There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy.Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R.Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02).Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
allenice完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
音乐发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔应助沙拉采纳,获得10
2秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
3秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
3秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
英俊的铭应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
万能图书馆应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
赘婿应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
cc应助夏夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
yun尘世应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
仿生人完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
CodeCraft应助yxy采纳,获得10
4秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
福娃发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527723
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107826
关于积分的说明 9286663
捐赠科研通 2805577
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539998
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716878
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709762