A systematic review of multivitamin and multimineral supplementation for infection

复合维生素的 医学 荟萃分析 置信区间 安慰剂 随机对照试验 相对风险 内科学 微量营养素 梅德林 显著性差异 维生素 替代医学 政治学 病理 法学
作者
Audrey I. Stephen,Alison Avenell
出处
期刊:Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics [Wiley]
卷期号:19 (3): 179-190 被引量:50
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2006.00694.x
摘要

Abstract Background Infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Micronutrients have important functions in the body's immune system. This systematic review examined the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on whether multivitamin and multimineral supplementation is effective in reducing infection. Methods Electronic databases searched: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. Hand searching of nutrition journals and reference lists was carried out. RCTs and quasi‐randomized trials of supplementation of adults with at least two vitamins or minerals or a combination were selected. Study results were combined in meta‐analysis plots where appropriate. Results Twenty studies were included in the review. Small numbers were available for each meta‐analysis. Results are presented here without the Chandra group studies. No significant difference was found in the number of episodes of infection in older people (≥65 years) between those supplemented and those not supplemented; (WMD) 0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.04, 0.16], P = 0.25. In other adults groups, there were significantly less episodes of infection in those supplemented; (WMD) −1.20 (95% CI −2.08, −0.32), P = 0.008. There was no significant difference between those older people supplemented and those not supplemented in the number with at least one infection; relative risk (RR) 0.98 (95% CI 0.86, 1.11), P = 0.77. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the numbers in other adult groups who had at least one episode of infection between those supplemented and those taking placebo; (RR) 0.81 (95% CI 0.65, 1.00), P = 0.06. Subgroup analyses suggested that supplemented people aged 65 years or over may benefit more if they are undernourished and supplemented for over 6 months, WMD −0.67 infections (95% CI −1.24, −0.10), P = 0.02. Conclusion Further large trials are needed, particularly in undernourished older people. Trials of supplementation periods of over 6 months are recommended.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
2秒前
落尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
YA发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
superjing发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
15274887998发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
秋风的应助被ichris采纳,获得20
7秒前
张思睿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
蓝天的应助被XXKK采纳,获得10
8秒前
落尘完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
牛123456发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
ljr完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
仁爱的狗发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
ICE给ICE的求助进行了留言
10秒前
11秒前
李健的应助被YC采纳,获得10
12秒前
幻画完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
酷波er的应助被小唐采纳,获得10
12秒前
胖娃罗完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
洼地的浮游生物完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
秋风的应助被津门姑娘采纳,获得10
14秒前
丘比特的应助被Nature采纳,获得10
14秒前
Ava的应助被YA采纳,获得10
15秒前
幻画发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
AZOEZ发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
18秒前
慕青的应助被superjing采纳,获得10
18秒前
daomaihu发布了新的文献求助100
20秒前
淇奥完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
张思睿完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
lucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
沐兮完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Dawn of Philology 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.) 310
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7821408
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9348463
关于积分的说明 20547827
捐赠科研通 7414284
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3333044
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479026
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2353279