观察研究
质量(理念)
背景(考古学)
置信区间
证据质量
出版偏见
随机对照试验
质量得分
循证医学
医学
心理学
统计
替代医学
数学
运营管理
外科
内科学
病理
工程类
认识论
哲学
古生物学
公制(单位)
生物
作者
Howard Balshem,Mark Helfand,Holger J. Schünemann,Andrew D Oxman,Regina Kunz,Jan Brožek,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Yngve Falck–Ytter,Joerg J Meerpohl,Susan L. Norris
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
摘要
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI