医学
心脏病学
队列
心肌梗塞
内科学
射血分数
心率
前瞻性队列研究
心率变异性
梗塞
心力衰竭
血压
作者
Axel Bauer,Jan W. Kantelhardt,Petra Barthel,Raphaël Schneider,Timo H. Mäkikallio,Kurt Ulm,Katerina Hnatkova,Albert Schömig,Heikki V. Huikuri,Armin Bunde,Marek Malík,Georg Schmidt
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2006-05-01
卷期号:367 (9523): 1674-1681
被引量:601
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68735-7
摘要
Decreased vagal activity after myocardial infarction results in reduced heart-rate variability and increased risk of death. To distinguish between vagal and sympathetic factors that affect heart-rate variability, we used a signal-processing algorithm to separately characterise deceleration and acceleration of heart rate. We postulated that diminished deceleration-related modulation of heart rate is an important prognostic marker. Our prospective hypotheses were that deceleration capacity is a better predictor of risk than left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN).We quantified heart rate deceleration capacity by assessing 24-h Holter recordings from a post-infarction cohort in Munich (n=1455). We blindly validated the prognostic power of deceleration capacity in post-infarction populations in London, UK (n=656), and Oulu, Finland (n=600). We tested our hypotheses by assessment of the area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC).During a median follow-up of 24 months, 70 people died in the Munich cohort and 66 in the London cohort. The Oulu cohort was followed-up for 38 months and 77 people died. In the London cohort, mean AUC of deceleration capacity was 0.80 (SD 0.03) compared with 0.67 (0.04) for LVEF and 0.69 (0.04) for SDNN. In the Oulu cohort, mean AUC of deceleration capacity was 0.74 (0.03) compared with 0.60 (0.04) for LVEF and 0.64 (0.03) for SDNN (p<0.0001 for all comparisons). Stratification by dichotomised deceleration capacity was especially powerful in patients with preserved LVEF (p<0.0001 in all cohorts).Impaired heart rate deceleration capacity is a powerful predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction and is more accurate than LVEF and the conventional measures of heart-rate variability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI