The Cost-Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Compared With Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

医学 增粘剂 透明质酸 富血小板血浆 骨关节炎 外科 质量调整寿命年 成本-效用分析 成本效益 关节内 内科学 物理疗法 血小板 病理 替代医学 风险分析(工程) 解剖
作者
Eric M. Samuelson,Jeffrey A. Ebel,Scott B. Reynolds,Ryan M. Arnold,David E. Brown
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:36 (12): 3072-3078 被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.027
摘要

Purpose To examine the cost-effectiveness of a series (total of 3 injections) of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in comparison to that of hyaluronic acid (HA) viscosupplementation for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Methods Outcome data regarding the use of PRP or HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were determined from the highest-quality data (Level I) available in the literature until 2015. Health utility values were then derived from these high-quality data. Costs were determined by examining typical charges for patients undergoing a series of either PRP or HA injections for the treatment of this condition at a large private orthopaedic practice. These health utility values and costs were used to create an expected-value decision analysis model. Results The results of the model revealed that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a series of PRP injections was $8,635.23/QALY and that of a series of HA injections was $5,331.75/QALY. A series of PRP injections was associated with a higher initial cost than a series of HA injections (difference, $1,433.67); however, PRP was also more effective (higher utility value) than HA by 0.11 QALYs (0.69 vs 0.58, P = .0062) at 1 year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the use of PRP injections as opposed to HA was $12,628.15/QALY. Conclusions Although a series of either PRP ($8,635.23/QALY) or HA ($5,331.75/QALY) injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis would be considered cost-effective (cost per QALY < $50,000), PRP injections were not more cost-effective than HA injections. However, PRP was significantly more effective at 1 year, and being associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,628.15/QALY when compared with HA, a series of PRP injections should be considered a reasonable and acceptable alternative to HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence Level II, economic and decision analysis of Level I studies. To examine the cost-effectiveness of a series (total of 3 injections) of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in comparison to that of hyaluronic acid (HA) viscosupplementation for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Outcome data regarding the use of PRP or HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were determined from the highest-quality data (Level I) available in the literature until 2015. Health utility values were then derived from these high-quality data. Costs were determined by examining typical charges for patients undergoing a series of either PRP or HA injections for the treatment of this condition at a large private orthopaedic practice. These health utility values and costs were used to create an expected-value decision analysis model. The results of the model revealed that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a series of PRP injections was $8,635.23/QALY and that of a series of HA injections was $5,331.75/QALY. A series of PRP injections was associated with a higher initial cost than a series of HA injections (difference, $1,433.67); however, PRP was also more effective (higher utility value) than HA by 0.11 QALYs (0.69 vs 0.58, P = .0062) at 1 year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the use of PRP injections as opposed to HA was $12,628.15/QALY. Although a series of either PRP ($8,635.23/QALY) or HA ($5,331.75/QALY) injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis would be considered cost-effective (cost per QALY < $50,000), PRP injections were not more cost-effective than HA injections. However, PRP was significantly more effective at 1 year, and being associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,628.15/QALY when compared with HA, a series of PRP injections should be considered a reasonable and acceptable alternative to HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
秋水发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
琪琪发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
南瓜豆腐给南瓜豆腐的求助进行了留言
刚刚
1秒前
琴箫枫发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Jing发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小新发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
简历完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刻苦天寿发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
peachneko发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
赘婿应助菠萝西米露采纳,获得10
4秒前
林云夕完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
谦三发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
Orange应助寒冷的元芹采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
小马甲应助韩飞采纳,获得10
6秒前
funny完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
祝由轩发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
JamesPei应助航仔采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
小巧吐司发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
朱琦发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
guagua应助萨比采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
幸运的羊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
yxy130704完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
豆花发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7501209
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9091493
关于积分的说明 19396128
捐赠科研通 7110749
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3250843
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2420260
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2236855