Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

医学 特应性皮炎 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 内科学 外科
作者
Derek K. Chu,Alexandro Chu,Daniel Rayner,Gordon Guyatt,Juan José Yepes‐Nuñez,Luis G. Gómez-Escobar,Lucía C. Pérez-Herrera,Juan Pablo Díaz Martinez,Romina Brignardello‐Petersen,Behnam Sadeghirad,Melanie Wong,Renata Ceccacci,Irene X. Zhao,John Basmaji,Margaret MacDonald,Xiajing Chu,Nazmul Islam,Ya Gao,Ariel Izcovich,Rachel Netahe Asiniwasis
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:152 (6): 1493-1519 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.030
摘要

BackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects.ObjectiveWe sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments.MethodsFor the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups—group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s).ResultsThe 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes—among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5—among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5—among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6—among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4—among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4—among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3—among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus.ConclusionsFor individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects. We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments. For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups—group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s). The 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes—among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5—among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5—among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6—among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4—among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4—among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3—among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. For individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
务实大神完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
求大佬帮助完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
dodo应助ElbingX采纳,获得300
2秒前
3秒前
vander完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
jam发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
斯文败类应助livialiu采纳,获得10
3秒前
致行完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
谭刚完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
Yang发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
冷静新烟完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
SciGPT应助ok123采纳,获得10
6秒前
Su发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Wang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wanwei完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
香蕉静芙完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
LCC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
JamesPei应助tcf采纳,获得10
7秒前
冷静新烟发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
木木完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
烟花应助快点毕业采纳,获得30
10秒前
郭柳含发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
万能图书馆应助风风风采纳,获得10
11秒前
英姑应助陪你去流浪采纳,获得10
11秒前
雪白的凡灵完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
思源应助5km采纳,获得10
11秒前
kwm关闭了kwm文献求助
12秒前
12秒前
顾矜应助123采纳,获得30
12秒前
大个应助1111采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
郭先森发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Tree完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Ava应助jam采纳,获得10
13秒前
lcyss发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
chaobada完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
piers应助Never采纳,获得10
14秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 500
Coking simulation aids on-stream time 450
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4016130
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3556145
关于积分的说明 11320169
捐赠科研通 3289087
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1812382
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 887923
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 812051