决策辅助工具
后悔
医学
随机对照试验
患者满意度
决策质量
物理疗法
乳房再造术
决策分析
家庭医学
护理部
乳腺癌
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
癌症
机器学习
统计
计算机科学
数学
作者
Cynthia Mardinger,Anna K. Steve,Carmen Webb,Kerry A. Sherman,Claire Temple‐Oberle
标识
DOI:10.1097/prs.0000000000009830
摘要
Decision aids are useful adjuncts to clinical consultations for women considering breast reconstruction. This study compared the impact of two online decision aids, the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and the Alberta Health Services (AHS) decision aid, on decisional conflict, decisional satisfaction, and decisional regret.This randomized controlled trial included 60 women considering whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction. Two online decision aids, the AHS and the BRECONDA, were compared using randomized two-arm equal allocation. Participants responded to questionnaires at baseline, after the first and second consultations, and at 6 weeks and 6 months after deciding to, or not to, undergo reconstruction. Change in decisional conflict scores was compared between the BRECONDA and the AHS decision aid. Secondary outcomes included decisional regret and decisional satisfaction.Both groups were similar in demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics. Women spent more time consulting the BRECONDA in comparison to women using the AHS decision aid (56.7 ± 53.8 minutes versus 28.4 ± 27.2 minutes; P < 0.05). Decisional conflict decreased (P < 0.05), and decisional satisfaction improved over time in both groups (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences based on the type of decision aid used (P > 0.05). Both decision aids had a similar reduction in decisional regret (P > 0.05).Decision aids decrease decisional conflict and improve decisional satisfaction among women considering breast reconstruction. Physicians should therefore offer patients access to decision aids as an adjunct to breast reconstruction consultations to help patients make an informed decision.Therapeutic, I.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI