Disclosure of suicidal ideation and behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

自杀意念 荟萃分析 心理学 临床心理学 流行 精神科 干预(咨询) 自杀意念 出版偏见 自杀预防 医学 毒物控制 流行病学 内科学 环境卫生
作者
David John Hallford,Danielle Rusanov,B. Winestone,Robert C. Kaplan,Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz,Glenn Melvin
出处
期刊:Clinical Psychology Review [Elsevier]
卷期号:101: 102272-102272 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102272
摘要

Disclosure of suicidal ideation and behaviours, defined as thoughts, plans, or attempts, to other people provides opportunity for intervention and prevention. This study is the first to meta-analyze all available studies to estimate the prevalence of disclosure, to whom people disclose, and examine factors that influence disclosure. Databases were searched for studies reporting samples of people who had experienced suicidal ideation or behaviours (including those who had died by suicide) and whether they had disclosed this. Almost 100 studies (k = 94, N participants = 1,044,629) were included in the overall prevalance analysis. The results showed less than half of people disclosed suicidal ideation or behaviour: 45.9% (95%CI 41.9–49.9%, PI 12.3–81.8%; k = 94). High heterogeneity, common to prevalence studies, was found (Q[93] = 130,584, p < .001; I2 = 99.9%). No publication bias was detected. Removing outliers did not change the prevalence estimate, but provided tighter prediction intervals: 45.6% (95%CI 43.4–47.9%, PI 35.8–55.7%; k = 33). Disclosure was related to higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders, female gender, and a longer timeframe of suicidal ideation or behaviour. Prevalence of disclosure was lower among people who died by suicide, relative to community samples, and lower when reported verbally rather than written online. Disclosure, and proportions of disclosures, to family members, was numerically higher than to friends or professionals, but could not be directly compared. In conclusion, between 50 and 60% of people do not disclose their suicidal ideation and behaviours to other people, and therefore remain unidentified and potentially untreated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
共享精神应助哈比采纳,获得10
刚刚
赵哥发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1459完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
小蘑菇应助许吖吖采纳,获得10
3秒前
情怀应助yingtiao采纳,获得10
4秒前
brotherpeng完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助Xiang采纳,获得10
7秒前
酷波er应助Xiang采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
mei完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
zzc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
安仔完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
自然盼柳发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
幸福果汁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
畅快城发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
可乐鸡翅发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
李健应助格格巫采纳,获得10
14秒前
张小杰发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助典雅的静采纳,获得10
16秒前
SciGPT应助卡卡罗特采纳,获得10
17秒前
自然盼柳完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
岚岚完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
Steven完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
kyle完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
月光入梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
高海龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
天御雪完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
坚强丹雪完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
Lire en communiste 1000
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 800
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
中国氢能技术发展路线图研究 500
Communist propaganda: a fact book, 1957-1958 500
Briefe aus Shanghai 1946‒1952 (Dokumente eines Kulturschocks) 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3168208
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2819559
关于积分的说明 7927087
捐赠科研通 2479402
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1320787
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 632907
版权声明 602458