Disclosure of suicidal ideation and behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

自杀意念 荟萃分析 心理学 临床心理学 流行 精神科 干预(咨询) 自杀意念 出版偏见 自杀预防 医学 毒物控制 流行病学 内科学 环境卫生
作者
David John Hallford,Danielle Rusanov,B. Winestone,Robert C. Kaplan,Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz,Glenn Melvin
出处
期刊:Clinical Psychology Review [Elsevier]
卷期号:101: 102272-102272 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102272
摘要

Disclosure of suicidal ideation and behaviours, defined as thoughts, plans, or attempts, to other people provides opportunity for intervention and prevention. This study is the first to meta-analyze all available studies to estimate the prevalence of disclosure, to whom people disclose, and examine factors that influence disclosure. Databases were searched for studies reporting samples of people who had experienced suicidal ideation or behaviours (including those who had died by suicide) and whether they had disclosed this. Almost 100 studies (k = 94, N participants = 1,044,629) were included in the overall prevalance analysis. The results showed less than half of people disclosed suicidal ideation or behaviour: 45.9% (95%CI 41.9–49.9%, PI 12.3–81.8%; k = 94). High heterogeneity, common to prevalence studies, was found (Q[93] = 130,584, p < .001; I2 = 99.9%). No publication bias was detected. Removing outliers did not change the prevalence estimate, but provided tighter prediction intervals: 45.6% (95%CI 43.4–47.9%, PI 35.8–55.7%; k = 33). Disclosure was related to higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders, female gender, and a longer timeframe of suicidal ideation or behaviour. Prevalence of disclosure was lower among people who died by suicide, relative to community samples, and lower when reported verbally rather than written online. Disclosure, and proportions of disclosures, to family members, was numerically higher than to friends or professionals, but could not be directly compared. In conclusion, between 50 and 60% of people do not disclose their suicidal ideation and behaviours to other people, and therefore remain unidentified and potentially untreated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tianzml0应助ccalvintan采纳,获得10
1秒前
Owen应助熊大采纳,获得10
2秒前
鬼鬼发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
格子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Khalil完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
李麟发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
夏侯一兰发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
星辰完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
pluto应助終见己采纳,获得50
11秒前
111关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
九点一定起完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
故城发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
上官若男应助李麟采纳,获得10
16秒前
阿滕发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
hookie完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
vivi发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
曾艳发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
Lumi完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
Singularity举报kkjl求助涉嫌违规
21秒前
mosheng完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
鳕鹅完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
鱼竿完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
李健应助欢喜的丹翠采纳,获得10
22秒前
小蘑菇应助LGJ采纳,获得10
23秒前
桐桐应助lyh采纳,获得10
24秒前
毕个业完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
调研昵称发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
28秒前
云上人发布了新的文献求助20
30秒前
矮小的盼夏完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
Arilus发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
mosheng发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
医生发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
高分求助中
rhetoric, logic and argumentation: a guide to student writers 1000
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
A Chronicle of Small Beer: The Memoirs of Nan Green 1000
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History 900
Eric Dunning and the Sociology of Sport 850
The Cambridge Introduction to Intercultural Communication 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2918843
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2559698
关于积分的说明 6925506
捐赠科研通 2219109
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1179632
版权声明 588587
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 577260