材料科学
生物相容性
多孔性
复合材料
选择性激光熔化
脚手架
生物医学工程
结构工程
微观结构
冶金
工程类
医学
作者
Shuai Ma,Qian Tang,Changbao Zhu,Fuyou Wang,Qiang Feng,Jun Song,Rossitza Setchi,Chenglong Ma,Ran Tao
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100051
摘要
Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and in vivo bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The in vivo experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI