Ultra-Processed Foods and Human Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

医学 荟萃分析 血脂异常 前瞻性队列研究 环境卫生 置信区间 梅德林 相对风险 肥胖 队列研究 糖尿病 系统回顾 内科学 内分泌学 政治学 法学
作者
Marilena Vitale,Giuseppina Costabile,Roberta Testa,Giovanna D’Abbronzo,Immacolata Cristina Nettore,Paolo Emidio Macchia,Rosalba Giacco
出处
期刊:Advances in Nutrition [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:15 (1): 100121-100121 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.advnut.2023.09.009
摘要

Evidence of associations between ultra-processed foods (UPF) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease is emerging, but it is unclear how much this is influenced by the methodology used to assess the UPF intake or by the level of consumption. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate 1) the association between UPF consumption and risk of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, using prospective cohort studies; 2) the differential associations depending on the methodology used to assess UPF intake and the level of UPF consumption and 3) the quality of evidence using the NutriGrade scoring system. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus through 1 April, 2023, on studies conducted in humans providing data for the highest compared with the lowest UPF consumption categories. Summary relative ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. Out of 4522 articles retrieved from the literature search, 25 reports met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis, 7 for diabetes, 5 for hypertension, 3 for dyslipidemia, and 13 for obesity. A consistently positive association between high UPF intake and increased risk of developing diabetes (37%), hypertension (32%), hypertriglyceridemia (47%), low HDL cholesterol concentration (43%), and obesity (32%) was observed, even if the quality of evidence was not satisfying. However, these risks varied significantly depending on the methodology used to assess UPF consumption, with a difference of more than 50% between the methods. Based on the level of intake, we did not observe significant differences in the results. These findings show that UPF consumption is associated with higher risk of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, but the level of risk consistently changes depending on the methodology used to assess UPF intake. Therefore, caution should be used when interpreting and extrapolating the results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
开庆完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
佩吉的布丁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
桃子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
蚂蚁踢大象完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_8Y26PL完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
凸迩丝儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
唐唐完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
11完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
慕容飞凤完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Yolo完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
anhuiwsy完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
zs完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
LinglongCai完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
bobochi完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
1257应助BioRick采纳,获得10
34秒前
lizef完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
慕子完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
小白兔完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
yujie完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
53秒前
钱都进兜里完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
听话的大碗完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
57秒前
Ava应助孙卫平采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ANESTHESIA_XY完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
兮以城空完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
ltf完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Aiden完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
南瓜完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
土豆晴发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
lxlcx完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
经纲完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
liaomr完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研丁完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
TAO LEE完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
繁荣的代秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
vv完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
中国国际图书贸易总公司40周年纪念文集: 回忆录 2000
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
Die Elektra-Partitur von Richard Strauss : ein Lehrbuch für die Technik der dramatischen Komposition 1000
How to Create Beauty: De Lairesse on the Theory and Practice of Making Art 1000
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 670
大平正芳: 「戦後保守」とは何か 550
LNG地下タンク躯体の構造性能照査指針 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3001368
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2661212
关于积分的说明 7207850
捐赠科研通 2297123
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1218189
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 593993
版权声明 592955