医学
耐受性
冲程(发动机)
安慰剂
不利影响
内科学
临床试验
随机对照试验
物理疗法
中医药
急性中风
替代医学
病理
机械工程
工程类
组织纤溶酶原激活剂
作者
Sherry H. Young,Yingxin Zhao,Angeline Koh,Rajinder Singh,Bernard P.L. Chan,Hui Meng Chang,Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian,Christopher Chen
出处
期刊:Cerebrovascular Diseases
[S. Karger AG]
日期:2010-01-01
卷期号:30 (1): 1-6
被引量:42
摘要
Previous clinical trials have shown that Neuroaid (MLC601), a traditional Chinese medicine, shows good tolerability and superiority over another traditional Chinese medicine in terms of neurological disability and functional outcome and thus may be beneficial as part of a poststroke rehabilitation program. The safety of MLC601 on hemostasis, hematology and biochemistry has been established in normal subjects and patients with nonacute stroke over a short treatment period. We assessed the safety of Neuroaid in patients with acute stroke treated for 3 months in a substudy of an ongoing randomized placebo-controlled trial.Laboratory tests (biochemical, hematological and electrocardiogram) were conducted at the month 3 follow-up, in addition to baseline tests. A total of 114 patients were recruited. As there were 13 dropouts, a total of 52 patients on MLC601 and 49 on placebo were available for analysis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were also analyzed.There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between treatment groups in biochemical, hematological or electrocardiogram tests at month 3, nor any statistically or clinically significant differences in the absolute and relative changes of the various parameters between baseline and 3 months. SAEs were similar and were those commonly seen in stroke patients.Longer-term laboratory safety data show no differences between MLC601 and placebo, confirming the safety of MLC601 in acute stroke patients receiving a 3-month treatment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI