参照物
心理学
情感(语言学)
动词
语言学
判决
语义学(计算机科学)
代词
认知心理学
哲学
计算机科学
沟通
程序设计语言
作者
Kumiko Fukumura,Roger P. G. van Gompel
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.001
摘要
Research has shown that following a sentence fragment such as John impressed Mary because…, people are most likely to refer to John, whereas following John admired Mary because…, Mary is the preferred referent. Two written completion experiments investigated whether such semantic biases affect the choice of anaphor (pronouns vs. names). Experiment 1 investigated biases due to verb semantics, and Experiment 2 contrasted biases due to different connectives (because vs. so). Frequency-based accounts such as proposed by Arnold (2001) and functional linguists (e.g., Givón, 1988, Givón, 1989) suggest that the likelihood of reference to a particular discourse entity should affect the choice of anaphor: more pronouns (relative to names) for the bias-consistent entity than the bias-inconsistent entity. Although the semantics of the verb and connective had strong effects on the choice of referent, neither experiment showed any effect of semantic bias on the choice of anaphoric form. In contrast, structural factors did affect anaphoric choice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI