心理学
概念化
判别效度
特质
人格
人格评估量表
心理信息
DSM-5
临床心理学
人格病理学
增量有效性
心理测量学
五大性格特征
人格障碍
测试有效性
社会心理学
梅德林
人工智能
法学
程序设计语言
计算机科学
政治学
内部一致性
作者
Cristina Crego,Thomas A. Widiger
摘要
The predominant maladaptive trait models are now provided by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Section III, assessed by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012), and the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11; assessed by the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD; Oltmanns & Widiger, 2018). However, 2 historical precedents are the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ; Livesley & Jackson, 2009) and the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1993). The current study administered the DAPP-BQ, SNAP, PiCD, and PID-5 to a sample of 323 persons with a history of mental health treatment. The results provided support for the historical precedence of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP, although also suggest that additional traits should perhaps be included in current models. The results also bear on additional ongoing issues, including (but not limited to) the bipolarity of maladaptive personality structure, the conceptualization of identity problems as a trait, and the discriminant validity of maladaptive trait models and their assessment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI