主成分分析
多元统计
层次聚类
数据挖掘
透视图(图形)
计算机科学
相关性
多元分析
典型相关
函数主成分分析
联想(心理学)
统计分析
星团(航天器)
机器学习
人工智能
数学
统计
聚类分析
心理学
几何学
程序设计语言
心理治疗师
作者
Daniel Granato,Jânio Sousa Santos,Graziela Bragueto Escher,Bruno Luís Ferreira,Rubén M. Maggio
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.12.006
摘要
The development of statistical software has enabled food scientists to perform a wide variety of mathematical/statistical analyses and solve problems. Therefore, not only sophisticated analytical methods but also the application of multivariate statistical methods have increased considerably. Herein, principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) are the most widely used tools to explore similarities and hidden patterns among samples where relationship on data and grouping are until unclear. Usually, larger chemical data sets, bioactive compounds and functional properties are the target of these methodologies. In this article, we criticize these methods when correlation analysis should be calculated and results analyzed. The use of PCA and HCA in food chemistry studies has increased because the results are easy to interpret and discuss. However, their indiscriminate use to assess the association between bioactive compounds and in vitro functional properties is criticized as they provide a qualitative view of the data. When appropriate, one should bear in mind that the correlation between the content of chemical compounds and bioactivity could be duly discussed using correlation coefficients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI