Lung transplantation from donation after cardiocirculatory death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 科克伦图书馆 内科学 相对风险 置信区间 肺移植 移植 系统回顾 捐赠 预期寿命 重症监护医学 梅德林 人口 环境卫生 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Dustin C. Krutsinger,Robert M. Reed,Amy Blevins,Varun Puri,Nilto C. De Oliveira,B. Zych,Servet Bölükbas,Dirk Van Raemdonck,Gregory I. Snell,Michael Eberlein
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:34 (5): 675-684 被引量:134
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2014.11.009
摘要

Background Lung transplantation (LTx) can extend life expectancy and enhance the quality of life for select patients with end-stage lung disease. In the setting of donor lung shortage and waiting list mortality, the interest in donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) is increasing. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes between DCD and conventional donation after brain death (DBD). Methods PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We identified original research studies with 1-year post-transplant survival data involving >5 DCD transplants. We performed meta-analyses examining 1-year survival, primary graft dysfunction, and acute rejection after LTx. Results We identified 519 citations; 11 observational cohort studies met our inclusion criteria for systematic review, and 6 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There were no differences found in 1-year mortality after LTx between DCD and DBD cohorts in individual studies or in the meta-analysis (DCD [n = 271] vs DBD [n = 2,369], relative risk [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–1.31, p = 0.52, I2 = 0%). There was also no difference between DCD and DBD in a pooled analysis of 5 studies reporting on primary graft dysfunction (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.73, p = 0.7, I2 = 0%) and 4 studies reporting on acute rejection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49–1.05, p = 0.09, I2 = 0%). Conclusions Survival after LTx from DCD is comparable to survival after LTx from DBD in observational cohort studies. DCD appears to be a safe and effective method to expand the donor pool. Lung transplantation (LTx) can extend life expectancy and enhance the quality of life for select patients with end-stage lung disease. In the setting of donor lung shortage and waiting list mortality, the interest in donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) is increasing. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes between DCD and conventional donation after brain death (DBD). PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We identified original research studies with 1-year post-transplant survival data involving >5 DCD transplants. We performed meta-analyses examining 1-year survival, primary graft dysfunction, and acute rejection after LTx. We identified 519 citations; 11 observational cohort studies met our inclusion criteria for systematic review, and 6 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There were no differences found in 1-year mortality after LTx between DCD and DBD cohorts in individual studies or in the meta-analysis (DCD [n = 271] vs DBD [n = 2,369], relative risk [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–1.31, p = 0.52, I2 = 0%). There was also no difference between DCD and DBD in a pooled analysis of 5 studies reporting on primary graft dysfunction (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.73, p = 0.7, I2 = 0%) and 4 studies reporting on acute rejection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49–1.05, p = 0.09, I2 = 0%). Survival after LTx from DCD is comparable to survival after LTx from DBD in observational cohort studies. DCD appears to be a safe and effective method to expand the donor pool.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
酷波er应助hello采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
唯美发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
hnlgdx发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
一根完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
七月完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
xiaojiahuo完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
自信不愁完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
潇湘雪月发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Arthur完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
芋孟齐完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
高手发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
WN发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
超级的鹅发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
FashionBoy应助axin采纳,获得10
26秒前
胡霖完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
流飒完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
香蕉觅云应助牛马码字员采纳,获得10
28秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
CAOHOU应助林sir采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
甜甜亦巧完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
栗惠发布了新的文献求助20
30秒前
30秒前
31秒前
33秒前
小二郎应助高手采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
民科王聪发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
YaoZhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989242
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531393
关于积分的说明 11253753
捐赠科研通 3270010
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804868
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882084
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809136