Cardiovascular toxicity of angiogenesis inhibitors in treatment of malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 需要伤害的数量 血管生成 内科学 心脏病学 缺血 药理学 相对风险 需要治疗的数量 置信区间
作者
Husam Abdel‐Qadir,Josée-Lyne Ethier,Douglas S. Lee,Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan,Eitan Amir
出处
期刊:Cancer Treatment Reviews [Elsevier]
卷期号:53: 120-127 被引量:198
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.12.002
摘要

Background The cardiovascular risk of angiogenesis inhibitors is not well-quantified. We hypothesized that, compared to direct vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (anti-VEGF antibodies or decoy receptors), small molecule agents have higher risk due to their less specific mechanism. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for phase III randomised controlled trials comparing angiogenesis inhibitor-based therapy to other systemic therapy. Outcomes evaluated were hypertension, severe hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, congestive heart failure, cardiac ischemia, arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, and fatal cardiovascular events. Data were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects method to generate odds ratios (OR). Results We identified 77 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Compared to routine care, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of hypertension (OR 5.28 [4.53–6.15], number needed to harm [NNH] 6), severe hypertension (OR 5.59 [4.67–6.69], NNH 17), cardiac ischemia (OR 2.83 [1.72–4.65], NNH 85) and cardiac dysfunction (OR 1.35 [1.06–1.70], NNH 139). VEGF inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism (OR 1.52 [1.17–1.98], NNH 141). No significant interaction was observed between the two drug subgroups for any outcomes. We identified no significant increase in the risk of the other outcomes evaluated. Conclusion Angiogenesis inhibitors increase the risk of hypertension, arterial thromboembolism, cardiac ischemia and cardiac dysfunction. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between direct VEGF inhibitors and small molecule agents.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ应助鼠鼠采纳,获得30
刚刚
minlinggui完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
共享精神应助123采纳,获得10
1秒前
杳鸢应助温暖月饼采纳,获得80
2秒前
太行神鹰完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刻苦冷菱发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
在北榄跳伞的西梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
minlinggui发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
wudi19887应助飞飞飞采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
睡觉的鲸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助狗十七采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
田様应助不爱吃草莓酱采纳,获得10
13秒前
在水一方应助Shibssjd采纳,获得10
14秒前
李晨光完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
滕皓轩发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
bai完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
橘又青发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
把握当下发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
HJJHJH发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
背后的初蓝完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
在水一方应助margo采纳,获得10
23秒前
LK完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
赘婿应助柚子可乐不加糖采纳,获得10
24秒前
飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
孤独曲奇完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
29秒前
ding应助做梦采纳,获得10
29秒前
爆米花应助123采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
苦瓜炒蛋发布了新的文献求助20
32秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Востребованный временем 2500
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview manual and scoring guide 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 700
中介效应和调节效应模型进阶 400
Refractive Index Metrology of Optical Polymers 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3443772
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3039907
关于积分的说明 8978775
捐赠科研通 2728422
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1496514
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 691668
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 689213