Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
zaboom发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
科勒基侈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
丘比特应助砂糖采纳,获得10
1秒前
歪歪完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
666完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
彭于晏应助phebe采纳,获得10
3秒前
谦让的雨灵完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
西门博超发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
DDxy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Akim应助keren采纳,获得10
3秒前
高桂花发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助期待采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
小满发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
安瑞巴蒂完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助沉静丹寒采纳,获得10
7秒前
猫独秀完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
酷波er应助YanZ830采纳,获得10
7秒前
Hazel发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
小烟花关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
无花果应助liu采纳,获得10
8秒前
充电宝应助nan采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Bloomy发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
大模型应助老六采纳,获得10
9秒前
田様应助自然的行恶采纳,获得10
10秒前
寄鲲鹏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
HEL完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
安瑞巴蒂发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
深情安青应助高桂花采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
小光发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
田俊垚完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
shred完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Continuing Syntax 1000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Work • Third edition • 2025 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Pharma R&D Annual Review 2026 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6214268
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8039778
关于积分的说明 16754456
捐赠科研通 5302534
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2825058
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1803382
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1663969