Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被aurora采纳,获得10
刚刚
瘦瘦语兰完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
华仔的应助被自由发带采纳,获得10
2秒前
ISSING完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
luohuimo完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
徒花发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
GGF发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
vae发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
东郭乾完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Akim的应助被Tadakoi采纳,获得10
6秒前
瘦瘦语兰发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
莲枳榴莲完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
adasda发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Mry完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
hhhh完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Avvei完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
狂野的听云完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
花开富贵发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
春告精完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
李健的应助被yuk采纳,获得20
14秒前
长情烤鸡完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Alex完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI2S的应助被Gloria2023采纳,获得10
16秒前
赘婿的应助被王冰露采纳,获得20
18秒前
Jessie爱吃鱼完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
无奈书蝶完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
GGF完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Firsterchao发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
无极微光的应助被凡倾宇采纳,获得20
23秒前
cjh完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
NatureScience完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
LAM关注了科研通微信公众号
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Erzählte Gnade 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8086606
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9500412
关于积分的说明 21418888
捐赠科研通 7655099
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3403165
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2532198
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2441808