Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
慧慧完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
无极微光应助方梓言采纳,获得20
刚刚
kook完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
懵懂的钥匙完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
SciGPT应助大力的图图采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
齐羽完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Enyiqi001完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
tinatian270完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
篮孩子完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
3秒前
想吃泡粉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
名字有点甜诶完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
小太阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
堪稀发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
香蕉香菱完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
南卡完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
wlx完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
啦啦啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
醒醒发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
天真依玉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
minss完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
Ephemerality完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
vvvvv完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
无限师完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
阳光倾斜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
冷傲雨寒完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
安之完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
李健应助关耳采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6013498
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7583278
关于积分的说明 16141021
捐赠科研通 5160807
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763446
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1743562
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634380