Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
irisxiong完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
陇与泷完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
ArmadilloLucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
脑洞疼应助欧阳铭采纳,获得10
3秒前
zzx完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
景严完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
标致鹏涛完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
王小志发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助李杰杰采纳,获得10
6秒前
DW应助Li656943234采纳,获得10
7秒前
舒心玉米完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
willward完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Cici发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
桔汁糖江发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
顾矜应助h777采纳,获得10
14秒前
圣晟胜完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
英俊的铭应助开放的听安采纳,获得10
15秒前
秋风应助Jack采纳,获得10
16秒前
暴躁的傲之完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
djkdjkf发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
文艺寄风发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
17秒前
FashionBoy应助Scidog采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
科研通AI6.2应助宛秋采纳,获得10
22秒前
不懂发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
陌上花开完成签到,获得积分0
23秒前
夏夏完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7773945
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9315902
关于积分的说明 20348368
捐赠科研通 7359650
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3317323
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2465859
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2332545