Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
坚定的谷芹完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
芃123完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
刘清发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
chenamy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
华仔的应助被yinhe028采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
樊乐发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zdw完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
hnlgdx完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Shi___yi发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
李雯静完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
程佳运发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
skycause完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
jachin完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被Jodie采纳,获得30
8秒前
深情安青的应助被追寻书雁采纳,获得30
9秒前
踏实河马完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
CarryLJR的应助被墨尘采纳,获得10
9秒前
自由的M发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小马甲的应助被samgood采纳,获得10
10秒前
razor发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
冷艳冷安完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
泡芙小姐发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被justin采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
深情安青的应助被TT2022采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
trajectory完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
柠檬羊乐多完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
爪子发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
Encyclopedia of Geology 2nd Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7805047
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9338676
关于积分的说明 20492464
捐赠科研通 7397030
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3327649
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2474536
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2345768