Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zj发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
开放傲旋完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
任性的鼠标完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
椰子鸡完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小娄完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
文艺的安青应助jess采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
小蘑菇应助xiaozhu采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
yan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
东晓发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
早晚炸了学校完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
今天不下雨完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
花无忧发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
Owen应助Lynn采纳,获得10
17秒前
乐乐应助曾经的尔曼采纳,获得10
17秒前
马泽轩完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
SciGPT应助大王采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
凡人发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
26秒前
27秒前
洛故故发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
賀禹寒彬完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
wanwan发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
文艺的安青应助韩莹莹采纳,获得10
29秒前
李健应助开放傲旋采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
老实的文龙完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Ava应助5433采纳,获得10
31秒前
泽北完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Stratospheric Ozone: A Textbook 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7360684
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8970303
关于积分的说明 19066178
捐赠科研通 7007138
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3223198
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2386934
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2204010