Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Fanxzrz发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
硕鼠烟酒牲完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
Smile完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
hey完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
正途完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
56633985发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
小二郎的应助被虚幻的梦容采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
nanfeng发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
江南完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
李健的应助被直率的听枫采纳,获得10
1秒前
xinxinxin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
dududu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0的应助被小秋采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
滴滴答答发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
CodeCraft的应助被艾拉舞悠采纳,获得30
3秒前
3秒前
蜜儿发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被苹果采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
wj完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
华仔的应助被Hommand_藏山采纳,获得10
4秒前
任佳怡发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
优雅溪灵关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
丘比特的应助被终南成风采纳,获得10
4秒前
sun完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
清风朗月发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小蘑菇的应助被shaojiaikeyan采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
天予发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
dehors发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Transcriptional Profiling Shows that Gcn4p Is a Master Regulator of Gene Expression during Amino Acid Starvation in Yeast 750
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8126162
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9529330
关于积分的说明 21578278
捐赠科研通 7706150
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3416657
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2542375
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2457832