Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
结实树叶完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
华仔应助Sylvia77xr采纳,获得10
1秒前
文艺雁兰发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
yj发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
HH完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
从容的乐松完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
xing_xing应助别管我是谁采纳,获得20
5秒前
5秒前
爱猫的纭完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
yzy应助jinyu采纳,获得10
6秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
小蘑菇应助毛哥采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
竹噶完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
是刘刘吗发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
12345发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
Shalala完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
白枫完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
东方羽之佳完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
顾矜应助hhb采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
张欢馨应助hsx采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Moonpie发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
英姑应助爱猫的纭采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
一叶知秋完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
Akim应助别叫我吃饭饭饭采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
How to Use Machine Learning in Chemistry: An Introduction 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7581876
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9160885
关于积分的说明 19601027
捐赠科研通 7164113
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3266010
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2430947
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2257208