Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
皮蛋廋肉粥完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
万能图书馆应助熊敏采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
lee_li完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
KD完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xiao完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
mei完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
852应助meditooo采纳,获得10
3秒前
丘比特应助河狸采纳,获得10
3秒前
从容的代双完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
章鱼小丸子19完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
七月完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
咕噜咕噜发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
合适尔蝶发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
DW应助漂亮的凛采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助嘎嘎嘎采纳,获得10
3秒前
岳普完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Apple完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
专一的谷南完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
olivia完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
夏阳发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
逸风发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
瑾瑜完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
杨天天发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Ava应助美好海安采纳,获得10
6秒前
不安的映寒完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
机灵芷容发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
childe发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
liyuze完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ruui完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
kong完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
zxp完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
W1ndyKnight完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7740292
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9289038
关于积分的说明 20193425
捐赠科研通 7318510
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3306434
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2458669
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2316546