Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
单薄的雍完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
科研通AI6.1应助zz采纳,获得20
刚刚
Pengjiajia778852完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Ping完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
元元完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
四叶草哦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zhaoyuli发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
双一刘应助blUe采纳,获得20
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助欢呼的晓夏采纳,获得10
4秒前
绵绵猫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
静默发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
852应助姜姜采纳,获得50
6秒前
luck发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小崔读研完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
dorkoom发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
所所应助椒盐皮皮虾采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Silvia完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Diss发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
娜行完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
可靠向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
大个应助EGG采纳,获得10
13秒前
吴昊东发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Celeste完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
future完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Silence完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
情怀应助小密母采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
xiangguoSun发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Electrode Potentials 550
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
Handbook of Luminescence Dating 500
Safety Pharmacology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6977917
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8657009
关于积分的说明 18354187
捐赠科研通 6439399
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3091961
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2148073
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2068475