Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review

检查表 医学 科克伦图书馆 接收机工作特性 糖尿病 梅德林 随机森林 系统回顾 机器学习 预测建模 人口 2型糖尿病 人工智能 荟萃分析 内科学 计算机科学 统计 数学 心理学 内分泌学 法学 认知心理学 环境卫生 政治学
作者
Kuo Ren Tan,Jun Jie Benjamin Seng,Yu Heng Kwan,Ying Jie Chen,Sueziani Binte Zainudin,Dionne Hui Fang Loh,Nan Liu,Lian Leng Low
出处
期刊:Journal of diabetes science and technology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (2): 474-489 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
摘要

Background: With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance. Results: Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias. Conclusions: Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation. Protocol Registration: Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tt发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
猛发sci发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
tudu101发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
英姑应助popkeke采纳,获得10
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助dyx采纳,获得10
2秒前
爆米花应助玉ER采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
gyhmm完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
浮浮发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ySX应助Iris采纳,获得30
3秒前
科研通AI6.3应助直播员采纳,获得10
3秒前
Lucas应助zhaomr采纳,获得20
4秒前
打打应助xxb采纳,获得30
4秒前
日落时分完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
michi完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
xinlixi完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
领导范儿应助小小科研采纳,获得10
5秒前
陈飞达发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
一二三四发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
bcc666发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
勤奋丹萱完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
科尔弥陀完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
纤指细轻捻完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Z1完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
慕青应助简简采纳,获得10
9秒前
小二郎应助小鹿采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
勤奋丹萱发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
1733发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 3000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6317656
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8133779
关于积分的说明 17050286
捐赠科研通 5372608
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2852102
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1830008
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1681564