Radiology-guided percutaneous approach is superior to EUS for performing liver biopsies

医学 放射科 经皮
作者
Ji Young Bang,Thomas J. Ward,Shady Guirguis,Konrad Krall,Francisco Contreras,Nirag Jhala,Udayakumar Navaneethan,Robert H. Hawes,Shyam Varadarajulu
出处
期刊:Gut [BMJ]
卷期号:70 (12): 2224-2226 被引量:35
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324495
摘要

Although liver biopsies (LBs) are being increasingly performed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance, there are limited data comparing outcomes with current standard-of-care, transabdominal ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous (PC) methods. In a randomised trial, we observed that the PC, US-guided method yielded significantly more optimal specimens, defined as specimen length of 25 mm or greater and presence of at least 11 complete portal tracts, compared with the EUS-guided method (57.9% vs 23.8%, p=0.028). Also, the PC method resulted in worse initial postprocedural pain but was less costly (US$1824 vs US$3240, p<0.001). Despite significant advances in non-invasive assessment, LB still remains the gold standard for evaluation of subacute and chronic liver diseases, whose clinical presentation can oftentimes be both confusing and challenging.1 LB is usually performed percutaneously under the guidance of real-time imaging using transabdominal US or CT, or via the transjugular approach in patients with underlying coagulopathy. More recently, endoscopists have been performing the procedure via the transgastric or transduodenal route under EUS guidance. Perceived advantages include the ability to simultaneously exclude diseases in the pancreas or bile duct, access to both the left and right lobes of the liver, and avoidance of intraprocedural pain as EUS is performed under sedation.2 While prospective single-arm and retrospective comparative studies suggest that EUS-guided LB can establish the diagnosis in more than 90% of patients and is equally successful,3 4 there are no randomised trials comparing outcomes with PC methods. Additionally, in the present era of cost containment, financial analysis is critical in healthcare decision-making, particularly for commonly indicated procedures such as LB. Therefore, we conducted a randomised trial comparing specimen quality and financial costs between PC and EUS-guided LB methods. Eligible consecutive patients from outpatient clinics or inpatient wards were referred by hepatologists to undergo LB and were randomised to either EUS-guided …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wenbin发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
SciGPT应助zhudaxia采纳,获得10
2秒前
小熊星星发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
4秒前
李健应助马绍清采纳,获得10
4秒前
缥缈逍遥完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
自由莺发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
冬瓜熊发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
豆子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
6秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
NPC应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
小强发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
斯文尔阳发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
吉岭茶完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
张坤完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
z123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
珍惜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李健的小迷弟应助00采纳,获得10
16秒前
斯文尔阳完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
小mol仙发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
搞钱完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
23秒前
Endeavor完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
zho应助斯文的傲珊采纳,获得10
25秒前
脑洞疼应助无限的时光采纳,获得10
25秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 800
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3076162
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2729044
关于积分的说明 7507177
捐赠科研通 2377267
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1260526
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 611000
版权声明 597164