亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

过敏反应 医学 肾上腺素 荟萃分析 梅德林 内科学 过敏 麻醉 免疫学 政治学 法学
作者
Nandinee Patel,Kok Wee Chong,Alexander Yip,Despo Ierodiakonou,Joan Bartra,Robert Boyle,Paul Turner
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:148 (5): 1307-1315 被引量:59
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042
摘要

BackgroundRegulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated.ObjectiveOur aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available.MethodsWe searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109.ResultsA total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition.ConclusionAround 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine. Regulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated. Our aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available. We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109. A total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition. Around 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yutang完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助yuaner采纳,获得10
3秒前
Marciu33发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
11秒前
zhw完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
seebeg发布了新的文献求助20
22秒前
27秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
cocolu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
完美芹发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
完美芹完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
ChenW.完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
gy完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
50秒前
yuanquaner完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
滴滴哒哒完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
耶格尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
LZY完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
1分钟前
斯文败类应助小卡拉米采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Isaac完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
czyzyzy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
yuaner发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
子月之路完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
深情安青应助yuaner采纳,获得10
1分钟前
yuaner完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
lalalatiancai发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
yuaner发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
奇拉维特完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
yuaner发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
CodeCraft应助zzx采纳,获得10
2分钟前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation 2000
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger Heßler, Claudia, Rud 1000
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 1000
Natural History of Mantodea 螳螂的自然史 1000
A Photographic Guide to Mantis of China 常见螳螂野外识别手册 800
How Maoism Was Made: Reconstructing China, 1949-1965 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3322522
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2953852
关于积分的说明 8567034
捐赠科研通 2631396
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1439859
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 667250
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 653711