医学
质量(理念)
梅德林
重症监护医学
家庭医学
哲学
认识论
政治学
法学
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:1989-02-24
卷期号:261 (8): 1151-1151
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.1989.03420080065026
摘要
To the Editor. —
Dr Donabedian1makes an ambiguous assertion when he claims that the technical quality of the health care provided by physicians is based on the health outcomes they achieve in patients, while at the same time acknowledging that physicians are obligated to serve the best interests of patients. Problems ensue when one argues that health outcome is the primary grounds on which to define quality and that medicine allows concerns beyond health. The problem is that the outcome approach to quality binds medicine to the goal of opposing disease, despite the fact that diseases can be preferred to health. For example, some patients in rational fashion choose the drawbacks (including side effects) detrimental to health brought about by the oral contraceptive to have greater autonomy, freedom to enjoy career choices, preferred spacing of children, and other benefits. Consequently, Dr Donabedian cannot hold that the goal of
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI