认识论
社会学
混乱
多样性(政治)
社会文化进化
管理科学
社会科学
心理学
哲学
人类学
精神分析
经济
作者
Daniel R. Williams,Michael E. Patterson
标识
DOI:10.1080/08941920701537015
摘要
Abstract Place ideas in natural resource management have grown in recent years. But with that growth have come greater complexity and diversity in thinking and mounting confusion about the ontological and epistemological assumptions underlying any specific investigation. Beckley et al. (Citation2007) contribute to place research by proposing a new methodological approach to analyzing attachments to place and exploring the relative importance of biophysical versus sociocultural attributes in determining place attachment. While our thinking has benefited from their contributions to place research, we see an increasing need to clarify the multiple and competing paths for place research easily obscured in the heap of similar-sounding place concepts. Our commentary cautions against philosophically unguided methodological experimentation and offers some critique of their conceptual approach to place. Keywords: commodity metaphorcritical pluralismepistemologymixed methodsplace
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI