角加速度
矢状面
角速度
运动学
医学
冠状面
加速度
毒物控制
横截面
主管(地质)
足球
物理医学与康复
物理
解剖
地质学
医疗急救
经典力学
地貌学
法学
政治学
作者
Erik E. Swartz,Jason P. Mihalik,Laura C. Decoster,Adam E. Hernandez
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2011.08.020
摘要
The purpose was to compare head kinematics between the Eject Helmet Removal System and manual football helmet removal. This quasi-experimental study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. Thirty-two certified athletic trainers (sex, 19 male and 13 female; age, 33 ± 10 years; height, 175 ± 12 cm; mass, 86 ± 20 kg) removed a football helmet from a healthy model under 2 conditions: manual helmet removal and Eject system helmet removal. A 6-camera motion capture system recorded 3-dimensional head position. Our outcome measures consisted of the average angular velocity and acceleration of the head in each movement plane (sagittal, frontal, and transverse), the resultant angular velocity and acceleration, and total motion. Paired-samples t tests compared each variable across the 2 techniques. Manual helmet removal elicited greater average angular velocity in the sagittal and transverse planes and greater resultant angular velocity compared with the Eject system. No differences were observed in average angular acceleration in any single plane of movement; however, the resultant angular acceleration was greater during manual helmet removal. The Eject Helmet Removal System induced greater total head motion. Although the Eject system created more motion at the head, removing a helmet manually resulted in more sudden perturbations as identified by resultant velocity and acceleration of the head. The implications of these findings relate to the care of all cervical spine–injured patients in emergency medical settings, particularly in scenarios where helmet removal is necessary.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI