斯科普斯
Internet门户
家庭医学
医学
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)
互联网
替代医学
公共卫生
梅德林
临床试验
政治学
万维网
内科学
病理
计算机科学
法学
作者
Sally Hopewell,Mike Clarke,David Moher,Elizabeth Wager,Philippa Middleton,Douglas G. Altman,Kenneth F. Schulz
出处
期刊:The Lancet
[Elsevier]
日期:2008-01-01
卷期号:371 (9609): 281-283
被引量:420
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61835-2
摘要
In 2006, Arthur Amman, President of Global Strategies for HIV Prevention, made a disquieting remark: “I recently met a physician from southern Africa, engaged in perinatal HIV prevention, whose primary access to information was abstracts posted on the internet. Based on a single abstract, they had altered their perinatal HIV prevention program from an effective therapy to one with lesser efficacy. Had they read the full text article they would have undoubtedly realized that the study results were based on short-term follow-up, a small pivotal group, incomplete data, and unlikely to be applicable to their country situation. Their decision to alter treatment based solely on the abstract's conclusions may have resulted in increased perinatal HIV transmission.” 1 The PLoS Medicine EditorsThe impact of open access upon public health. PLoS Med. 2006; 3: e252 Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI